Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Appeal E258 of 2022· [2022] KECA 1014 (KLR)

Kamanja v Equity Bank Limited & another

Court of Appeal
23 September 2022
813 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a late appeal notice but refused to stop an auction because no appeal had actually been filed yet.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi by Gachoka, JA, on a notice of motion by Robert Maina Kamanja seeking leave to file a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time against a ruling of the High Court at Kajiado (Mutuku, J) delivered on 24 May 2022 in Civil Suit No. E016 of 2021, together with interim injunctions restraining Equity Bank Limited and Keysian Auctioneers from disposing of or auctioning property NGONG/NGONG/91927. The court dismissed prayers 2 and 3, holding that Rule 5(2)(b) relief is available only where a notice of appeal or record of appeal has already been filed, and that a Rule 5(2)(b) application is not a single-judge application and cannot be combined in an omnibus application. On the extension-of-time prayer, the court noted the application was filed about two months after the ruling, but the applicant's sworn explanation that he received no notification of the delivery date was unopposed, the respondents having filed nothing despite service. Guided by the principles in Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wanjohi Mwangi, the judge allowed the application in terms of prayer 1 only and directed the applicant to file and serve the notice of appeal within 14 days and the record of appeal within 30 days of filing the notice. The application was therefore partially allowed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether leave to file a notice of appeal out of time should be granted

Holding

Leave was granted; the applicant's explanation that he was not notified of the delivery date of the ruling was unopposed, and a delay of about two months was excused in the exercise of the court's discretion under Rule 4.

Reasoning

The court applied the principles in Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wanjohi Mwangi governing extension of time under Rule 4. The respondents, though served, filed nothing opposing the applicant's sworn claim that no notice of the ruling date was sent. The uncontradicted explanation, together with consideration of all relevant factors, justified excusing the delay and granting leave limited to prayer 1, with strict timelines imposed.

p. 2
02

Whether interim injunctive relief could be granted under Rule 5(2)(b) where no notice of appeal has been filed

Holding

No; prayers for injunction under Rule 5(2)(b) were premature and incapable of being granted because no notice of appeal had been filed.

Reasoning

The court held that Rule 5(2)(b) relief presupposes a filed notice of appeal or record of appeal. Since the applicant was himself seeking leave to file the notice of appeal out of time, the injunction prayers were premature. The court also noted that a Rule 5(2)(b) application is not a single-judge application and cannot be bundled into an omnibus application with a Rule 4 prayer. Both injunction prayers were dismissed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An application under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules can only be granted if a notice of appeal or record of appeal has already been filed in accordance with the rules.
  • A Rule 5(2)(b) application is not a single-judge application and an applicant cannot combine it with a Rule 4 extension-of-time prayer in one omnibus application.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayers 2 and 3 of the notice of motion dismissed
  2. 2.Leave granted to file the notice of appeal out of time in terms of prayer 1 only
  3. 3.Applicant to file and serve the notice of appeal within 14 days
  4. 4.Applicant to file the record of appeal within 30 days of filing the notice of appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 34
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 4
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)

Cases cited (1)

  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wanjohi Mwangi
    Civil Appeal No 251 of 1997

    Principles governing the exercise of discretion under Rule 4 in extension-of-time applications

On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kajiado
High Court Civil Suit No. E016 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 34 of the Civil Procedure Act and Rules 4 and 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kamanja v Equity Bank Limited & another", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Appeal E258 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1014/eng@2022-09-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.