Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application 069 of 2021· [2022] KECA 856 (KLR)

Principal Secretary Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government & 6 others v Wako & 6 others

Court of Appeal
22 July 2022
1,599 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused a ruling that cancelled a chief's appointment, keeping the current officeholder in place until the full appeal is heard.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a Rule 5(2)(b) ruling by the Court of Appeal at Nyeri (Okwengu, Sichale and Mbogholi-Msagha, JJA) in which the applicants, state officers including the Principal Secretary Ministry of Interior, sought stay of execution of an ELRC judgment (Marete, J, 26 July 2021). The ELRC had declared the recruitment of Mohamud Mohamed Godana as chief of Heilu location illegal, procedurally unfair and unconstitutional, and ordered a fresh recruitment exercise with stakeholder involvement and public participation, after a petition by Ali Jarso Wako and Borana Elders alleging violations of Articles 19, 27, 28 and 47 of the Constitution. The applicants filed a notice of appeal with sixteen grounds, contending among other things that the Judge granted a relief not prayed for, shifted the burden of proof, and delivered a contradictory judgment. Applying the twin principles in Stanley Kang’ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter, the Court found a single arguable ground sufficient - that the Judge granted relief not sought by the petitioners. On nugatory aspect, it held that execution could produce a different appointee, creating confusion, uncertainty contrary to public interest, and risking exacerbated tension between the Gabra and Borana communities. The Court allowed the motion and stayed execution of the ELRC judgment and decree pending the hearing of the appeal. No costs order was made. The ruling does not disturb the decision below; it preserves the status quo pending the substantive appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal is arguable

Holding

The appeal is arguable on the single ground that the learned Judge granted a relief (repetition of the recruitment exercise) that was not prayed for by the petitioners.

Reasoning

The Court applied the settled Rule 5(2)(b) principles from Stanley Kang’ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter. It did not make definitive findings of fact or law, holding that one bona fide arguable ground suffices. The ground that the Judge granted relief not sought by the petitioners was sufficient to meet arguability without embarrassing the full appeal.

p. 4
02

Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent a stay

Holding

Execution would result in a fresh recruitment possibly producing a different appointee, creating confusion, uncertainty and risk of exacerbated inter-communal tension; a stay is therefore appropriate.

Reasoning

The Court found someone already occupies the chief's position; execution could lead to another person's appointment, posing difficulties if the applicants succeed on appeal. It cited public interest, confusion and uncertainty, and the danger of heightened tension and insecurity between the Gabra and Borana communities as justifying preservation of the status quo.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • On an application under Rule 5(2)(b), a single bona fide arguable ground of appeal suffices to satisfy the arguability requirement.
  • The twin principles for stay under Rule 5(2)(b) are arguability of the appeal and that the appeal will not be rendered nugatory; both must be satisfied.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Order of stay of execution of the Judgment and Decree of the ELRC (Marete, J) dated 26th July 2021 issued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 75
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 19, 27, 28, 47
  • Public Service Commissions Act
  • Public Service Regulations
  • Human Resource Policies and Procedure Manual for the Public Service

Cases cited (1)

  • Stanley Kang’ethe Kinyanjui vs Tony Ketter & 5 others
    [2013] eKLR

    Principles for granting stay of execution pending appeal under Rule 5(2)(b) - arguability and nugatory twin tests

On appeal from
Employment & Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Constitutional Petition No. 22 of 2021 (also referred to as No. 22 of 2020)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Principal Secretary Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government & 6 others v Wako & 6 others", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application 069 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/856/eng@2022-07-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.