Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedElection Petition Appeal (Application) E004 of 2022· [2022] KECA 737 (KLR)

ODM National Election Board & another v Odhiambo & 2 others

Court of Appeal
22 July 2022
2,144 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal ruled that a political party must redo a cancelled nomination using the same voting method it originally promised members.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a Reasons judgment of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Kiage, Ngugi and Tuiyott, JJA) dismissing an appeal by the ODM National Election Board and the Orange Democratic Movement Party against a High Court judgment (Ochieng, J, 23 June 2022) that upheld a Political Parties Disputes Tribunal direction to conduct a fresh nomination for the South Sakwa Ward MCA nominee through universal suffrage. Edwin Odhiambo had been declared the party nominee after a universal suffrage nomination; following an internal appeal, the Elections Board directly nominated Eunice Achieng, prompting Edwin's successful PPDT complaint. The Board's review application failed, and it was cited for contempt. The Court of Appeal, exercising jurisdiction under section 41(2) of the Political Parties Act on a point of law, applied its own recent holdings in ODM National Elections Board v Ombewa Gare. It reaffirmed that while a party has unfettered discretion over its nomination method, where a universal suffrage nomination is nullified the repeat exercise must use the same method unless the party demonstrates impossibility due to intervening circumstances and has complied with the section 38E notification requirements. Party members, consistent with the constitutional public participation edict and the doctrine of legitimate expectation, are not mere bystanders. The Court also upheld the High Court's finding that the cross appeal targeted the PPDT judgment of 5th May 2022, not the later ruling. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs, it not having been opposed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a party that chose universal suffrage for a nomination that was nullified may conduct the repeat nomination by a different method

Holding

No. The party must repeat the nomination by the same method unless it demonstrates impossibility due to intervening circumstances and has made the notification required by section 38E of the Political Parties Act.

Reasoning

The Court adopted its holdings in ODM National Elections Board v Ombewa Gare. Section 38E requires notification to members and the Registrar of the nomination method, dates and venues, underscoring the public participation edict. Members are not mere bystanders; having been promised universal suffrage, they have a legitimate expectation that the repeat exercise will use the same method. The appellants failed to demonstrate impossibility even in their review application.

p. 5
02

Whether the High Court Judge misidentified the decision appealed against in the cross appeal

Holding

No. The Judge correctly found the cross appeal was against the PPDT judgment of 5th May 2022, not the ruling of 26th May 2022.

Reasoning

The Court found the Judge's clarity of mind evident from his own reasoning: the memorandum of appeal referenced the judgment of 5th May 2022, while the review motion referenced the ruling of 26th May 2022, and no appeal had been filed from a ruling. The cross appeal spoke for itself as being in respect of the judgment dated 5th May 2022.

Legal principles established

#
  • A political party has unfettered discretion on the method to employ in conducting its party nominations, but where a nomination by universal suffrage is nullified, the repeat exercise must be by the same method unless impossibility due to intervening circumstances is demonstrated and section 38E notification is made.
  • An appeal lies from the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal to the High Court on points of law and fact, and to the Court of Appeal on points of law, whose decision is final.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.No order as to costs, as the appeal was not opposed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Political Parties Actsection 38
  • Political Parties Actsection 38A
  • Political Parties Actsection 38E
  • Political Parties Actsection 41(2)
  • Political Parties (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2022section 24
  • ODM Party Primary and Nomination RulesRule 23

Cases cited (5)

  • Jacob Ochieng Ojuki of Orange Democratic Movement & 2 others
    High Court Election E274 of 2020

    Contended that the PPDT had no authority to decide for the party what nomination method to use

  • Michael Ojala Nyansi v Hezron Okoth Onditi & Others
    High Court Misc. Application No. 1 of 2020

    It is the mandate of the party to decide which nomination method to employ

  • ODM National Elections Board & another v Hon. John Ombewa Gare & 2 others
    Civil Appeal No. E003 of 2022

    Holdings on party discretion over nomination method and repeat nominations after nullification, reproduced in extenso

  • Communications Commission of Kenya & 5 others v Royal Media Services Limited & 5 others
    [2014] eKLR

    The concept of legitimate expectation is entrenched in Kenya

  • Moses Odhiambo Ochele v Achan Ojuki Gordon & 2 others
    Kisumu Civil Appeal No. E037 of 2022

    View of Kamau, J identified with by this Court on repeat nominations

On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kisumu
HC Civil Appeals Division Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 41(2) of the Political Parties Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "ODM National Election Board & another v Odhiambo & 2 others", Case Analysis (2022). Election Petition Appeal (Application) E004 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/737/eng@2022-07-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.