Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal 307 of 2016· [2022] KECA 596 (KLR)

Wamidha v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited & 4 others

Court of Appeal
28 April 2022
3,091 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that a bank validly sold a guarantor's land after sending statutory notices to her last known address.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, Pelesia Atieno Wamidha, appealed against the judgment of Ochieng, J. (14th July 2015) in HCCC No. 429 of 2002, which dismissed her claim challenging the sale of her property, L.R No. 6676/Section 1/Mainland North, Mombasa, and also dismissed the 1st respondent bank's counterclaim. The appellant had charged the property to secure an overdraft facility of up to Kshs 500,000 for a borrower; after default, the bank issued statutory notices, auctioned the property to the 2nd respondent, and title passed through the 3rd respondent to the 4th respondent. Before the Court of Appeal (Okwengu, Sichale and Ole Kantai, JJA), the appellant argued that the bank advanced an extra Kshs 65,000 facility without her consent, unilaterally varying the charge and discharging her; that the statutory notice and notification of sale were invalid under the Auctioneers Rules and in breach of a consent order of 21st May 2002; and that the judge failed to weigh the evidence evenly. The court, exercising its rule 29 first-appellate duty to re-appraise the evidence, found no admission of an extra facility and noted the charge and bank statements were absent from the record. It held that service of the statutory notice on the appellant's last known postal address, which she had given the bank and continued to use, discharged the bank's obligation. The notification-of-sale complaint failed because it was not pleaded. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the 1st and 4th respondents, affirming the High Court judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the bank unilaterally varied the charge by advancing an extra facility of Kshs 65,000, discharging the guarantor

Holding

No. DW1 did not admit an extra facility; the overdraft never exceeded the Kshs 500,000 limit, so the charge was not discharged.

Reasoning

The court examined DW1's cross-examination and found no admission of an extra Kshs 65,000 facility. The trial judge, who had seen the statement of account (absent from the appellate record), found the account was overdrawn only to Kshs 66,450.55 after honouring a cheque, well within the Kshs 500,000 limit. The bank kept the guarantor's liability within the secured sum, so the charge was not discharged.

p. 4
02

Whether service of the statutory notice was validly effected

Holding

Yes. Notice sent to the appellant's last known postal address, which she had given to the bank and continued to use, was sufficient.

Reasoning

The appellant admitted in cross-examination that P.O Box 90182 Mombasa was the address she gave the bank, that she changed her address in 2009 without notifying the bank, and that she still used the old address in 2012. The court held the bank could not be expected to serve any other address, and service on the last known address discharged the statutory obligation.

p. 6
03

Whether the notification of sale was invalid

Holding

The issue was not pleaded and could not be raised for the first time in final submissions.

Reasoning

The court endorsed the trial judge's finding that the further amended plaint of 19th May 2014 did not raise any issue concerning the notification of sale. A matter absent from the pleadings cannot become contentious via final submissions, so this ground of appeal failed.

Legal principles established

#
  • A first appellate court must re-appraise the evidence and draw its own inferences before reaching an independent conclusion.
  • A chargor discharges its statutory obligation to give notice by sending the statutory notice to the chargee's last known address; a chargee who changes address without notifying the chargee cannot complain of non-service.
  • An issue not raised in the pleadings cannot become a matter of contention when raised for the first time in final submissions.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appellant's appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents who took part in the appeal, namely the 1st and 4th respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal Rulesrule 29
  • Auctioneers Act
  • Auctioneers RulesRules 15(b) and (c)

Cases cited (1)

  • Selle & another v Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd & others
    (1968) EA 123

    Duty of a first appellate court to re-appraise evidence and draw its own inferences

On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
HCCC No. 429 of 2002
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction under the Court of Appeal Rules (rule 29), appeal from the High Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Wamidha v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited & 4 others", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Appeal 307 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/596/eng@2022-04-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.