Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Application E010 of 2020· [2022] KECA 527 (KLR)

Murage v Soft White Beach Limited & 5 others

Court of Appeal
6 May 2022
1,157 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal approved the draft order as drawn and confirmed that a pending review application does not suspend orders already granted.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-Judge ruling of the Court of Appeal (P. Nyamweya, JA) on the settlement of the terms of a draft order arising from the ruling of a full bench (W. Karanja, P.O Kiage and K. M'Inoti JJA) delivered on 29th January 2021, which had allowed the Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 26th October 2020 and granted prayers 4, 5 and 6 - interlocutory injunctions restraining the 1st to 3rd Respondents from selling, alienating or interfering with the Applicant's possession of Land Reference Number Chembe/Kibabamshe/393, and a stay of execution of the judgment of Olola J. in Malindi ELC No. 30 of 2011 (consolidated with HCCC No. 22 of 2011) pending the intended appeal. The Applicant extracted a draft order and served it on all Respondents by email, but none approved or objected to it, prompting the settlement application under Rules 33 and 34 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents opposed settlement, arguing that their pending application dated 29th January 2021 seeking to stay, review and set aside the orders justified suspending settlement. The Judge held that under Rule 34(2)(d) a single Judge may settle an order where the parties do not agree on its form; that the draft order accurately reproduced the granted prayers; and that the pending review application had no effect on the orders of 29th January 2021, which remain valid and binding unless and until stayed, varied or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction. The draft orders were approved as drawn, with no order as to costs of the application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Settlement of terms of a draft order under Rule 34(2)(d)

Holding

The draft order as drawn was clear, reproduced the wording of the granted prayers, and accurately reflected the Court's decision, and was therefore approved as drawn

Reasoning

The single Judge compared the draft order against the terms of the ruling of 29th January 2021, which had allowed the Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 26th October 2020 and granted prayers 4, 5 and 6. Finding the draft reproduced those prayers accurately, the Judge exercised the Rule 34(2)(d) power to settle the order by approving it as drawn.

p. 3
02

Effect of a pending review application on orders already granted

Holding

A pending application for review and setting aside has no effect on orders already granted; they remain valid and binding unless and until stayed, varied or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction

Reasoning

The 2nd and 3rd Respondents argued that settlement should be suspended because their application dated 29th January 2021 seeking to stay, review and set aside the orders was pending. The Judge held that such a pending application does not, of itself, suspend the operation of the orders, and that if the review succeeds, the successful party can then draft appropriate orders for approval.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where parties do not agree on the form of an order, or a draft order prepared by a successful party is not approved by the other party, the order may be settled by a single Judge of the Court of Appeal
  • A pending application for review or setting aside of orders does not suspend or invalidate those orders; they remain valid and binding unless and until stayed, varied or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The draft orders dated 29th January 2021 extracted by the Applicant are approved as drawn
  2. 2.No order as to the costs of this application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 33
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 34
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 34(2)(d)
On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Civil Application E010 of 2020 (Ruling of 29th January 2021)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 34(2)(d) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 - settlement of orders by a single Judge where parties do not agree on the form of an order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Murage v Soft White Beach Limited & 5 others", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application E010 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/527/eng@2022-05-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.