Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCriminal Application 81 of 2019· [2022] KECA 175 (KLR)

Rashid Shireku Akungwi v Republic

Court of Appeal
18 February 2022
1,073 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that convicted persons only get bail pending appeal if they show exceptional circumstances or an overwhelmingly strong appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, convicted of robbery with violence by the Mumias Principal Magistrate on 17 January 2012 and sentenced to death, had his conviction and sentence upheld by the High Court at Kakamega (Chitembwe & Dulu, JJ) on 28 September 2015. He filed a second appeal raising a single ground - that his sentence was unlawfully mandatory - and applied under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 49(1) of the Constitution for bail pending appeal, citing family hardship, his role as breadwinner, and willingness to abide by bond conditions. Before the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Kiage, Ngugi and Tuiyott, JJA), his counsel asserted that the presumption of innocence is restored upon lodging an appeal, a contention the court rejected as startling and contrary to first principles, since the applicant stood properly convicted twice over and did not challenge conviction. Prosecution counsel relied on Somo v Republic. The court restated the settled principles: bail pending appeal requires exceptional or unusual circumstances, or overwhelming chances of success on appeal; neither a solemn assurance not to abscond, nor family hardship, nor personal and domestic matters suffice. Drawing on Somo, Lamba v R, Jivraj Shah and Dominic Karanja, the court held the applicant satisfied none of the principles, found the application devoid of merit, and dismissed it. No costs order was made. The ruling binds subordinate courts and the High Court on the applicable bail-pending-appeal principles.

Key legal issues

#
01

Principles governing bail pending appeal

Holding

A convicted person must demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances, or that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success, to obtain bail pending appeal.

Reasoning

The court traced the settled principles from Somo v Republic, Lamba v R, Jivraj Shah and Dominic Karanja. Neither the applicant's assertion that he will not abscond, nor family hardship, nor personal and domestic matters constitute exceptional or unusual circumstances. The presumption of innocence, which informs pre-trial bail, is unavailable to a person convicted and whose conviction has been affirmed on first appeal.

p. 3
02

Whether presumption of innocence is restored upon lodging an appeal

Holding

It is not; counsel's contention to that effect was rejected as contrary to first principles.

Reasoning

The court noted the applicant had been found guilty at a proper trial and his conviction affirmed by the High Court, and he was not contesting conviction. The presumption of innocence is a fundamental consideration only for pre-trial bail under Article 49(1); it does not apply with equal force to bail pending appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Bail pending appeal requires exceptional or unusual circumstances or overwhelming chances of success on appeal; the presumption of innocence does not apply to a convicted person seeking post-conviction bail.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Criminal Procedure Codesection 357
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 49(1)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50

Cases cited (4)

  • Somo -vs- Republic
    [1972] EA 476

    Bail pending appeal requires exceptional or unusual circumstances; personal/family matters and non-absconding assurances do not suffice

  • Lamba v R
    [1958] E.A. 337

    Statement of the exceptional or unusual circumstances principle for bail pending appeal

  • Jivraj Shah -vs- Republic
    [1986] KLR 605

    Cited as subsequent authority applying the Somo principles

  • Dominic Karanja -vs- Republic
    [1980] KLR 612

    Overwhelming chances of success test; good character, family hardship and ill health not exceptional circumstances

On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kakamega
HCCRA No. 16 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 49(1) of the Constitution (as invoked by the applicant)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Rashid Shireku Akungwi v Republic", Case Analysis (2022). Criminal Application 81 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/175/eng@2022-02-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.