Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application No. E009 of 2021· [2021] KECA 791 (KLR)

Hon. Mike Sonko Mbuvi Gideon Kioko v Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 8 others

Court of Appeal
19 March 2021
369 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to block Anne Kananu's swearing-in as Nairobi Deputy Governor because the event had already happened.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By an application dated 5th January 2021, Mike Sonko Mbuvi Gideon Kioko sought conservatory orders in the Court of Appeal restraining Anne Kananu Mwenda from being sworn in as Deputy Governor of Nairobi City County and from assuming or executing the functions of Governor, pending an intended appeal against the ruling of Mrima, J. delivered on 15th January 2021 in Nairobi High Court Constitutional Petition No. E005 of 2021, consolidated with Constitutional Petition No. E009 of 2021. The 1st and 8th respondents took no position; the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th and 9th respondents opposed, arguing that the application had been overtaken by events because the 6th respondent had been sworn in as Deputy Governor on 15th January 2021. The applicant did not dispute this, and the court treated the swearing-in as a notorious fact within the public domain. In a short unanimous ruling delivered at Nairobi on 19th March 2021, the full bench of Koome, Musinga and M'inoti, JJ.A. held that a court does not make orders in vain or engage in academic exercises. Agreeing that the application had been overtaken by events, the court dismissed it with no order as to costs. The intended appeal on the substantive devolution and succession questions remains unaddressed; this ruling resolves only the futility of the interim conservatory relief sought.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mootness of conservatory relief where the impugned event has already occurred

Holding

The application was dismissed as moot because the 6th respondent had already been sworn in as Deputy Governor on 15th January 2021, a fact not denied by the applicant

Reasoning

The respondents opposed the application on the ground that on 15th January 2021 the 6th respondent was duly sworn in as Deputy Governor of Nairobi. The applicant did not deny this, and the court treated it as a notorious fact in the public domain. Because the relief sought related to a completed event, granting the orders would be pointless; a court does not make orders in vain. The application was therefore dismissed with no order as to costs.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A court will not issue orders that would serve no practical purpose because events have overtaken them; it will not engage in academic exercises

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application dismissed with no order as to costs
On appeal from
High Court at Nairobi
Constitutional Petition No. E005 of 2021 (consolidated with Constitutional Petition No. E009 of 2021)
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal over the intended appeal from the High Court; application for conservatory orders pending appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hon. Mike Sonko Mbuvi Gideon Kioko v Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 8 others", Case Analysis (2021). Civil Application No. E009 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/791/eng@2021-03-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.