Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedMemorandum of Appeal dated July 3, 2017 (from Nairobi HC Miscellaneous Application No. 159 of 2016)· [2021] KECA 348 (KLR)

Pharmacy and Poisons Board v Wanjala & 7 others (Civil Appeal 211 of 2017) [2021] KECA 348 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
17 December 2021
7,276 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~29 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed the National Quality Control Laboratory answers to the Pharmacy and Poisons Board, which now handles drug manufacturing inspections.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Court of Appeal decision concerned the question of whether the Pharmacy and Poisons Board or the National Quality Control Laboratory holds the statutory mandate to conduct Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) inspections and issue certificates of compliance under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act (Cap 244) and rule 10 of the Pharmacy and Poisons (Registration of Drugs) Rules. The appeal challenged the High Court's (Odunga J, March 16, 2017) decision quashing a circular by the Principal Secretary stopping the Laboratory from performing functions under sections 35A(5) and 35I(b), prohibiting the Board from usurping the Laboratory's functions, and compelling the Laboratory to perform GMP inspections. Counsel for the appellant informed the Court at hearing that the first two issues had been resolved by subsequent legislation: section 34 of Act No. 20 of 2017 amended the Act to vest the inspection and GMP compliance functions in the Board. The Court held that the appeal on those issues was thereby rendered moot. On the merits of the Laboratory's status, the Court held that the term 'facility' in section 35D(1) shows the legislature intended a body subordinate to and controlled by the Board, not an independent or complementary second regulator. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside orders (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the High Court judgment dated March 16, 2017, and ordered each party to bear its own costs of the trial in the High Court and of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Who, between the Pharmacy and Poisons Board and the National Quality Control Laboratory, has the legislative mandate to carry out GMP inspections and issue certificates of compliance

Holding

The appeal on this issue was rendered moot because section 34 of Act No. 20 of 2017 amended the Pharmacy and Poisons Act to vest the inspection and GMP compliance functions in the Board. The Court also held, on the merits of the role of the Laboratory, that the legislature intended to create a subordinate facility, not an independent body.

Reasoning

Parliament, by section 34 of Act No 20 of 2017 dated June 23, 2017, deleted the words vesting inspection powers in the Director of the National Drug Quality Control Laboratory and substituted 'The Board or any person authorized in writing by the Board', and deleted section 35I(b). This achieved the effect the impugned circular sought, resolving the dispute legislatively before the appeal was heard and rendering it largely academic. The appeal had merit given the Court's findings on the Laboratory's role.

p. 11
02

The status of the National Quality Control Laboratory vis-à-vis the Board

Holding

The use of the term 'facility' in section 35D(1) shows the legislature intended an organ subordinate to or within the control of the Board, not a complementary or independent second regulatory body.

Reasoning

The Court examined Part IIIB of the Act establishing the Laboratory, noting it is described as a 'facility' used for examination and testing of drugs, governed by a Board of Management appointed by the appellant, with a Director appointed by that Board of Management. This structure indicated subordination to the appellant rather than complementarity, contrary to the trial court's conclusion and the 1st respondent's submissions.

p. 2
03

Whether the appeal on rule 10 of the Pharmacy and Poisons (Registration of Drugs) Rules remained live

Holding

The rule 10 issue was also rendered moot by the legislative amendments, since all functions under the Act would now be performed by the appellant.

Reasoning

Once the legislature amended the law to vest the functions in the appellant, the question of who is the 'relevant agency' under rule 10 ceased to matter. The Laboratory operates as a facility within the control of the appellant with technical testing functions under section 35D(1)(c).

p. 14
04

Whether the trial court's order of prohibition exceeded its jurisdiction in judicial review proceedings

Holding

This issue was rendered moot by the legislative amendments; the Court did not resolve it on the merits.

Reasoning

The appellant argued the trial court wrongly concluded the Laboratory's mandate amounted to GMP inspection and wrongly issued prohibitory orders. The Court took the view that the amendments to the Act by Act No 20 of 2017 rendered this issue moot as well, leaving only the question whether the trial court's orders could stand.

p. 14

Legal principles established

#
  • The National Quality Control Laboratory was established under section 35D(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act as a 'facility' subordinate to and within the control of the Pharmacy and Poisons Board, not as an independent or complementary second regulatory body
  • Where legislation is amended so as to resolve the dispute, an appeal on those issues becomes moot and orders granted by the trial court based on the repealed provisions can no longer stand

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Set aside orders (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the judgment by the trial Court dated March 16, 2017, delivered in Nairobi HC Miscellaneous Application No 159 of 2016
  2. 2.Each party shall bear its own costs of the trial in the High Court and of this appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Pharmacy and Poisons Act, Cap 244 Laws of Kenyasections 2, 35A, 35B, 35C, 35D, 35E, 35F, 35H, 35I; Part IIIA; Part IIIB
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Registrations of Drugs) Rulesrule 10
  • Statutory Instruments Actsection 24(2)
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Actsection 31(b)
  • Clinical Officers (Training, Registration and Licensing) Act, 2017 (Act No. 20 of 2017)section 34
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 47
  • Civil Procedure Codeorder 53

Cases cited (6)

  • Peters vs Sunday Post Limited
    [1958] EA 424
  • Selle vs Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd.
    [1968] EA 123
  • Coffee Board of Kenya v Thika Coffee Mills Limited & 2 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Republic v Kenya Medical Laboratories Technicians and Technologist Board ex parte Archdiocese of Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees
  • Henry N.Gichuru vs The Ministry of Health and The Kenyatta National Hospital Board
    (2002) eKLR
  • Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others ex parte Central Kenya Fresh Merchants Limited
    (2008) eKLR
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Nairobi HC Miscellaneous Application No. 159 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal against the High Court's decision in judicial review proceedings (as framed by the Court, invoking its mandate on a first appeal per Peters v Sunday Post Limited)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Pharmacy and Poisons Board v Wanjala & 7 others (Civil Appeal 211 of 2017) [2021] KECA 348 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Memorandum of Appeal dated July 3, 2017 (from Nairobi HC Miscellaneous Application No. 159 of 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/348/eng@2021-12-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.