Ezekiel Nyangoya Okemwa v Kenya Marine & Fisheries Research Institute
The bottom line
#Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to strike out an appeal, confirming the official Certificate of Delay—not a typing pool Dispatch Book—controls appeal timelines.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Competency of the striking-out application under Rule 84
The application, lodged on 20th September 2019, was within 30 days of service of the Record of Appeal on 22nd August 2019 and was therefore competent.
Rule 84 permits any person affected by an appeal to apply to strike out the notice of appeal or the appeal where no appeal lies or an essential step was not taken within the prescribed time. However, the proviso bars such applications brought after thirty days from service of the notice of appeal or record of appeal. Since service was effected on 22nd August 2019 and the application was lodged on 20th September 2019, within the thirtieth day (21st September 2019), it was properly before the Court.
Whether the Record of Appeal was filed within time under Rule 82
The Record of Appeal filed on 16th August 2019 was within time, because time was excluded between the application for proceedings and the Certificate of Delay, and ran afresh from the date of the certificate.
Rule 82 fixes sixty days from lodgement of the Notice of Appeal, subject to the proviso excluding time certified by the registrar as required for preparation and delivery of proceedings. The Certificate of Delay showed the application for proceedings was made within thirty days of the decision, and time ran afresh from the certificate date, expiring on 19th September 2019. The Record of Appeal filed on 16th August 2019 was thus within time, notwithstanding the Notice of Appeal of 2016.
Evidential weight of the typing pool Dispatch Book versus the Certificate of Delay
The uncertified, illegible Dispatch Book is irrelevant for computing time under Rule 82; the Certificate of Delay governs.
The applicant relied on the Employment and Labour Relations Court's typing Dispatch Book to show proceedings were typed as early as 2016. The Court held the copy was uncertified, so its source and author could not be verified; the entries were crossed over and unclear; and, decisively, Rule 82 recognizes only the application for proceedings and the registrar's certificate as relevant documents for computing or excluding time. The Dispatch Book of a typing pool is not a relevant document for purposes of Rule 82.
Legal principles established
#- An application to strike out an appeal under Rule 84 must be brought within thirty days of the date of service of the notice of appeal or record of appeal.
- Under Rule 82, the documents relevant to computing or excluding time for instituting an appeal are the application for a copy of the proceedings and the registrar's certificate; a typing pool's Dispatch Book is not such a document.
- Time certified by the registrar as required for preparation and delivery of proceedings is excluded from the 60-day timeline for lodging an appeal, and time runs afresh from the date of the Certificate of Delay.
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 20th September 2019 is dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules (application to strike out an appeal)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Ezekiel Nyangoya Okemwa v Kenya Marine & Fisheries Research Institute", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 20th September 2019 (Civil Appeal record, Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/316/eng@2021-12-17
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.