Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application No. Nai. E128 of 2021 (Rule 5(2)(b) motion dated 6th May 2021)· [2021] KECA 198 (KLR)

Federation of Kenya Employers v Law Society of Kenya (Civil Application E141 of 2021) [2021] KECA 198 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
5 November 2021
1,180 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to pause the Law Society of Kenya's case against employers, because you cannot stay an order that merely dismisses your objection.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Federation of Kenya Employers moved the Court of Appeal under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules seeking a stay of proceedings in Nairobi High Court Petition 505 of 2019, pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal against the ruling of Makau, J. dated 17th March 2021, which dismissed the applicant's preliminary objection challenging the High Court's jurisdiction over the Law Society of Kenya's constitutional petition. The Society opposed, contending that a stay of proceedings is a grave judicial action that interferes with a litigant's right of access to justice and fair trial. The Court restated the settled twin principles under Rule 5(2)(b): an applicant must demonstrate an arguable appeal that is not frivolous, and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent a stay. Examining the impugned ruling, the Court found that it merely dismissed the preliminary objection with costs, ordering no party to do anything or refrain from anything. Following Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v EP Oranga and Raymond M. Omboga v Austine Pyan Maranga, it held that such a negative order is incapable of execution and there is nothing to stay. The applicant's motion dated 6th May 2021 was accordingly dismissed in its entirety with costs. The ruling below was not itself disturbed; the application simply failed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a stay can issue in respect of an order dismissing a preliminary objection

Holding

No. An order of dismissal that directs no party to do anything or refrain from anything is a negative order incapable of execution and cannot be the subject of a stay.

Reasoning

The Court examined the High Court ruling of 17th March 2021 and found it merely dismissed the applicant's preliminary objection with costs, without ordering any party to do or refrain from doing anything. Relying on Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v EP Oranga and Raymond M. Omboga v Austine Pyan Maranga, it held that where there is no positive order capable of execution, there is nothing to stay and the nugatory limb of Rule 5(2)(b) cannot be satisfied. The motion therefore failed in its entirety.

p. 3
02

The settled principles governing stay of execution or injunction under Rule 5(2)(b)

Holding

The twin principles are an arguable appeal (not necessarily one that must succeed, but not frivolous or idle) and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent a stay.

Reasoning

The Court restated the established Rule 5(2)(b) test as summarised in Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter & Others, affirming that the applicant bears the burden of establishing both limbs. It applied this framework to the present motion, finding the second limb could not be met because the impugned ruling was a negative order, and accordingly dismissed the application with costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under Rule 5(2)(b) must first demonstrate an arguable appeal that is not frivolous or idle, and secondly that the appeal would be rendered nugatory unless a stay is granted
  • A negative order - one that merely dismisses an application and does not order any party to do, refrain from doing, or pay anything - is incapable of execution and cannot be stayed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant's motion dated 6th May 2021 is dismissed in its entirety with costs
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Petition 505 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules (inherent/appellate discretion to grant stay of execution or injunction pending appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Federation of Kenya Employers v Law Society of Kenya (Civil Application E141 of 2021) [2021] KECA 198 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Civil Application No. Nai. E128 of 2021 (Rule 5(2)(b) motion dated 6th May 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/198/eng@2021-11-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.