Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNot stated in the judgment as supplied· [2021] KECA 26 (KLR)

Kanji v Gathigi (Civil Appeal 179 of 2018) [2021] KECA 26 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
23 September 2021
1,544 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that daughters inherit equally with sons, and step-grandchildren have no automatic claim to a deceased person's land.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal from the judgment of Kanyi Kimondo, J. of the High Court of Kenya at Muranga delivered on 31st October 2018, in a succession dispute over parcel LOC.15/Gakuyu/789 registered in the name of Njeri Wanjohi, who died intestate on 20th January 1981. The respondent, Susan Nyambura Gathigi, petitioned for letters of administration, while the appellant, her step-grandson and grandson of the deceased's co-wife, objected, contending that as a male step-grandson who occupied part of the land he should inherit, and that the respondent, a married woman with land in her matrimonial home in Meru, was disentitled. The High Court held that the respondent and her sister Violet Wambui Maina were the only children of the deceased and were entitled to equal shares. The Court of Appeal, comprising Asike-Makhandia, Murgor and ole Kantai JJA, sitting at Nairobi, re-appraised the evidence under its Rule 29 mandate as a first appellate court. Relying on Selle v Associated Motor Boat Company and its own decision in Stephen Gitonga M'Murithi v Faith Ngira Muriithi, the court applied section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, holding that the net intestate estate devolves equally upon surviving children irrespective of gender or marital status. It found the appellant's gender-based disinheritance argument had no standing in law and that the step-grandson had no priority. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondent. The judgment binds subordinate courts and the High Court on the gender-neutral application of section 38 and on the lack of priority of step-grandchildren in intestate succession.

Key legal issues

#
01

Priority of children of the deceased in intestate succession

Holding

The respondent and her sister, being the only children of the deceased who died intestate, ranked first in priority to inherit her land under section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.

Reasoning

The land was registered in the deceased's name, who died intestate in 1981 leaving two daughters and no spouse. Section 38 directs the net intestate estate to devolve equally upon surviving children. The court re-evaluated the evidence on its own mandate as a first appellate court and agreed with the trial judge's findings.

p. 4
02

Gender-based disinheritance of married daughters

Holding

A daughter cannot be excluded from inheritance merely because she is a woman, married, or has land in her matrimonial home.

Reasoning

The appellant argued that the respondent, being a married woman with land in Meru, could not inherit because the deceased had no male children. The court held this argument had no standing in law, endorsing the principle of gender-neutral equal distribution under section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.

p. 4
03

Entitlement of step-grandchildren

Holding

A step-grandson who is not a child of the deceased and was not maintained by her has no priority in the distribution of her intestate estate.

Reasoning

The appellant admitted he was a step-grandson of the deceased, being a grandson of the deceased's co-wife Wanjiku. His family had separate land. The court found the objectors were not children of the deceased and did not rank ahead of her surviving daughters.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • On a first appeal, the Court of Appeal must reconsider and evaluate the evidence and draw its own conclusions, though with due allowance for the trial judge
  • Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act enshrines equal distribution of the net intestate estate to surviving children irrespective of gender or marital status

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010Rule 29
  • Law of Succession ActSection 38
  • Law of Succession ActSections 41 and 42

Cases cited (2)

  • Selle & Another v Associated Motor Boat Company Limited & Others
    [1968] EA 123
  • Stephen Gitonga M’Murithi v Faith Ngira Muriithi
    [2015] eKLR
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Muranga
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 (Rule 29) - appellate jurisdiction over a High Court decision in a succession matter

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kanji v Gathigi (Civil Appeal 179 of 2018) [2021] KECA 26 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment as supplied. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/26/eng@2021-09-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.