Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application No. 318 of 2019· [2020] KECA 877 (KLR)

Henry Kandie - Chief Inspector of Police, OCS Ongata Rongai Police Station & 9 others v Mohammed Feisal & 19 others [2020] KECA 877 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
24 January 2020
1,605 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused payment of a Kshs.9.5 million+ police brutality judgment, confirming courts will grant stays where winning respondents can't repay the money.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Nambuye, Koome and Kantai, JJ.A.) on a motion under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules by ten applicants, including police officers attached to Ongata Rongai Police Station, the Attorney General, the National Police Service Commission and the Director of Public Prosecutions, seeking stay of execution of the judgment of Nyakundi, J. of the High Court at Kajiado delivered on 20th December 2018 in Constitutional Petition No. 14 of 2017. The High Court found that the respondents' rights under Articles 25, 27, 28, 29, 39 and 49 of the Constitution had been infringed upon their arrest and detention, awarding the 1st to 19th respondents general and exemplary damages of Shs.100,000 each and the 20th respondent, an advocate detained when attending to the others, Shs.3,000,000. The applicants filed a notice of appeal and sought stay pending the intended appeal. The Court applied the settled twin test: the applicant must show the appeal is arguable (not frivolous) and that it would be rendered nugatory absent stay. Holding that joint and several liability and the award of damages to non-testifying respondents were arguable points, and that the respondents had not shown ability to repay sums exceeding Shs.9,500,000, the Court granted stay and directed the applicants to file the appeal within 30 days. Costs of the motion were reserved to await the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal was arguable

Holding

The Court found the draft memorandum of appeal raised arguable points, including joint and several liability of the applicants and the award of damages to respondents who did not testify.

Reasoning

The Court perused the draft memorandum of appeal and identified two points: whether all applicants are jointly and severally liable for infringement of rights, and whether the judge was right to find in favour of parties and award damages when they did not testify. The Court held these were not frivolous but arguable points, sufficient to satisfy the first limb of the rule 5(2)(b) test without requiring the appeal to succeed.

p. 3
02

Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory absent stay

Holding

The Court was satisfied the appeal would be rendered nugatory because the respondents had not shown ability to repay sums in excess of Shs.9,500,000 if the appeal succeeded.

Reasoning

The respondents' counsel filed a notice to show cause in excess of Shs.9,500,000, and the 20th respondent did not address the Court on the respondents' ability to repay should the intended appeal succeed. The Court held that the respondents had not shown they could repay the monies, which was not a small sum, satisfying the second limb of the stay test.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay of execution pending appeal must demonstrate that the appeal or intended appeal is arguable, and if successful on that limb, must also show that the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent stay.
  • An arguable appeal is one that is not frivolous; an arguable point need not be one that must succeed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kajiado in Constitutional Petition No. 14 of 2017 pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal
  2. 2.Applicants to file the appeal within 30 days of the ruling
  3. 3.Costs of the motion to await hearing and determination of the intended appeal
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kajiado
Constitutional Petition No. 14 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Henry Kandie - Chief Inspector of Police, OCS Ongata Rongai Police Station & 9 others v Mohammed Feisal & 19 others [2020] KECA 877 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Civil Application No. 318 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2020/877/eng@2020-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.