Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNotice of motion dated 2nd December, 2019· [2020] KECA 576 (KLR)

Formax Insurance Brokers Limited v Glory Hotels & Investments Limited [2020] KECA 576 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
19 June 2020
572 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal gave Formax Insurance Brokers more time to file its appeal record, showing courts will extend deadlines when delays are properly explained.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi delivered by Okwengu, JA on 19th June 2020, determining a notice of motion dated 2nd December 2019 in which Formax Insurance Brokers Limited sought extension of time to file and serve a record of appeal against a High Court judgment (Njuguna, J) delivered on 4th July 2019. The applicant had filed a notice of appeal within time on 17th July 2019 and requested certified copies of the proceedings by letter dated 16th July 2019, copied to the respondent's advocates, and paid for them on 29th July 2019. A certificate of delay issued by the Deputy Registrar confirmed that the period from 29th July to 8th October 2019 was consumed in typing the proceedings and judgment, attracting exclusion under Rule 82 of the Court Rules. The court noted, however, that even after that exclusion there remained a period between 9th October and 6th December 2019 to be accounted for. The applicant explained that the certificate of delay was only issued on 25th November 2019, the same day the decree was extracted, and that the certificate was needed to support the application. The court therefore found that the only unexplained delay ran from 25th November to 6th December 2019, which it held was not inordinate. The respondent filed no replying affidavit and its counsel, Mr Ondimu, did not oppose the application. Exercising its judicial discretion under Rule 4, the court extended time by 30 days for filing and serving the record of appeal, and ordered the applicant to pay the costs of the application to the respondent. The ruling turned on established extension-of-time principles and cited no case law.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file and serve a record of appeal

Holding

Extension granted where the notice of appeal was filed within time, the certified-proceedings period is excluded under Rule 82, the residual unexplained delay was not inordinate, and the respondent did not object.

Reasoning

The court computed time using the certificate of delay, excluding the period the Deputy Registrar certified as necessary for typing proceedings and judgment. It isolated the only unexplained segment (25th November to 6th December 2019), found it not inordinate, noted the absence of a replying affidavit or opposition by the respondent, and exercised its Rule 4 discretion in the applicant's favour.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • The Court's discretion under Rule 4 to extend time must be exercised judicially, taking into account whether the notice of appeal was filed within time, the explanation for the delay, and prejudice to the respondent.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Extension of time for the applicant to file and serve the record of appeal against the judgment delivered on 4th July, 2019 within 30 days from the date of the ruling
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 4
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 82
On appeal from
High Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules (inherent extension-of-time jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Formax Insurance Brokers Limited v Glory Hotels & Investments Limited [2020] KECA 576 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Notice of motion dated 2nd December, 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2020/576/eng@2020-06-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.