Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application No. 154 of 2019· [2020] KECA 308 (KLR)

Nzoia Sugar Company Limited v Nobert Muhoro Ikundo Mwanyalo [2020] KECA 308 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
9 October 2020
602 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused enforcement of a Kshs.3.6 million employment award because the employee showed no means to refund it if the appeal succeeded.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judgment ruling of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Karanja, Asike-Makhandia and Gatembu, JJ.A) on an application dated 28th November 2019 by Nzoia Sugar Company Limited seeking stay of execution of a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu (Nduma, J.) dated 4th November 2019. The ELRC had dismissed the respondent's claim of unlawful and unfair termination but awarded him Kshs.3,655,573.48 in salary arrears, interest and costs. The applicant lodged a notice of appeal on 8th November 2019 and anchored the stay application on it. Applying the settled Rule 5(2)(b) twin test, the Court found the intended appeal arguable, noting the question whether the ELRC failed to consider evidence that the academic testimonials on which the respondent obtained employment were forged, and whether a party should benefit from an illegal act. On nugatory effect, the Court noted the respondent had threatened to execute the decree, had filed no replying affidavit or submissions despite service, and had not demonstrated means to refund the decretal amount if the appeal succeeded, the burden of which the applicant argued lay on him under NEMA v Masakha. The Court allowed the application, staying execution of the ELRC judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, with costs of the application to abide the appeal's outcome. The decision below was not disturbed; it remains in place but is not enforceable pending appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal is arguable

Holding

The Court found the appeal arguable, noting the issue whether the ELRC failed to consider evidence that the respondent's academic testimonials were forged and whether a party should benefit from an illegal act.

Reasoning

Applying the settled test, the Court held that an arguable appeal need not necessarily succeed but must be deserving of full consideration. The question whether the ELRC overlooked evidence of forged academic testimonials, and whether a party should benefit from an illegal act, sufficed to show the appeal was not frivolous.

p. 1
02

Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is declined

Holding

The Court found the nugatory test satisfied: the respondent had threatened to execute, and did not demonstrate ability to refund the decretal amount if the appeal succeeded.

Reasoning

The applicant showed the respondent had threatened execution and would be unable to refund the judgment amount if the appeal succeeded. Relying on NEMA v Masakha, the respondent bore the burden of showing means to refund, and filed no replying affidavit or submissions to discharge it. Stay was therefore warranted pending appeal.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay of execution pending appeal must demonstrate that the intended appeal is arguable and that, if stay is declined and the appeal succeeds, it will be rendered nugatory.
  • An arguable appeal is not one that must necessarily succeed, but one that is deserving of full consideration by the Court.
  • Where a party seeking to resist a stay asserts it cannot refund the decretal amount, the burden lies on the decree-holder to demonstrate means to refund the judgment amount if the appeal succeeds.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A stay of execution of the judgment dated 4th November 2019 of the ELRC in Kisumu Case No. 217 of 2015 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  2. 2.Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the appeal

Authorities

#

Cases cited (3)

  • Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited vs. Banking Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya)
    [2015] eKLR
  • China Road & Bridge Corporation (K) Ltd vs. African Gas & Oil Co. Ltd & 3 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • National Environment & Management Authority vs. Edward Juma Masakha
    [2015] eKLR
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
ELRC Cause No. 217 of 2015
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules (application for stay of execution pending appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nzoia Sugar Company Limited v Nobert Muhoro Ikundo Mwanyalo [2020] KECA 308 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Civil Application No. 154 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2020/308/eng@2020-10-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.