Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application No. E. 207 of 2020· [2020] KECA 133 (KLR)

Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme & 8 others v Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates [2020] KECA 133 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
4 December 2020
524 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused enforcement of an advocate fee ruling against the KPA Pension Scheme because a jurisdiction-free judgment cannot ground fee assessment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judgment ruling of the Court of Appeal (Musinga, Kiage and Sichale, JJ.A.) on a Notice of Motion dated 20th July 2020 brought by Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme and others under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, seeking stay of execution of a ruling and orders of the Employment & Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (James Rika, J) dated 17th July 2020 in ELRC Misc. Civil Application No. 13 of 2015. The intended appeal, against the firm of Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates, is to challenge whether a judgment that has been set aside as a nullity for want of jurisdiction can be a basis for assessing instruction fees between an advocate and a client. The applicant supported the motion with affidavits sworn by Stephen Kyandih and Peter Mbuthia Gachuhi; the respondent opposed, contending the intended appeal was frivolous. Applying the settled Rule 5(2)(b) principles from Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter & 5 others, the court found the twin requirements satisfied: the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal which would be rendered nugatory absent stay. The motion was allowed in its entirety, with costs of the motion to be in the intended appeal. This ruling is interlocutory and binds no issue on the merits; it preserves the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal. The decision below was not disturbed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal should be granted under Rule 5(2)(b)

Holding

The court found the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal and that it would be rendered nugatory absent stay, and allowed the motion.

Reasoning

Applying the principles in Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter, the court noted the applicant's intention to challenge on appeal whether a judgment set aside as a nullity for want of jurisdiction can be a basis for assessing instruction fees. The court found the appeal arguable and the apprehension that the respondent would move to execute the impugned ruling sufficient to show the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent stay. The motion dated 20th July 2020 was accordingly allowed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay under Rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate that the intended appeal is arguable and that, absent stay, the appeal will be rendered nugatory.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 20th July, 2020 is allowed
  2. 2.Costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)

Cases cited (1)

  • Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Keter & 5 others
    [2013] eKLR
On appeal from
Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Mombasa
ELRC Misc. Civil Application No. 13 of 2015
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Ports Authority Pension Scheme & 8 others v Kinyua Muyaa & Co. Advocates [2020] KECA 133 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Civil Application No. E. 207 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2020/133/eng@2020-12-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.