Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedMotion dated 28th June, 2018 (Court of Appeal, Civil Application - number not stated in the judgment)· [2019] KECA 599 (KLR)

Jacinta Wanza Makenzi v Agnes Mutinda Kithusi & 4 others [2019] KECA 599 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
21 June 2019
321 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application because it used the wrong procedure; if a single judge refuses to extend time, apply in writing to the Registrar within seven days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a short single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi delivered by W. Ouko, JA (P) on 21st June, 2019. The background was that on 27th April, 2018 Musinga, JA, sitting as a single judge, had declined to extend time within which the applicant could appeal a High Court decision of 6th October, 2014. The applicant then moved by a motion dated 28th June, 2018, under Rules 4 and 55(1)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, seeking leave to file a reference to a full court against Musinga, JA's ruling. When that motion came up for hearing on 8th November, 2018 neither the applicant nor counsel attended despite service, and Kantai, JA dismissed it, apparently under Rule 56. The applicant did not seek reinstatement of that dismissed motion; instead she filed the present motion, which again sought to go back behind Musinga, JA's ruling and made no mention of the Kantai, JA decision. Ouko, JA held that the proper remedy against a single judge's refusal of extension of time under Rule 55 is a written application to the Registrar within seven days to place the matter before a full court, and that the appropriate target was reinstatement of the dismissed motion. Finding the application ambiguous, grossly incompetent and bereft of substance, the court dismissed it with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Correct procedural route to challenge a single judge's refusal to extend time under Rule 55 of the Court of Appeal Rules

Holding

The application was dismissed as incompetent; the proper course was an application to the Registrar within seven days for the matter to be placed before a full court, or reinstatement of the motion dismissed by Kantai, JA

Reasoning

The court traced the procedural history: Musinga, JA declined extension of time on 27th April, 2018; the applicant then sought leave to file a reference to a full court; when that motion came up on 8th November, 2018 the applicant did not attend and Kantai, JA dismissed it, apparently under Rule 56. The instant motion ignored the Kantai dismissal entirely and was ambiguous as to the relief sought, rendering it incompetent.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a single judge rejects an application for extension of time under Rule 55 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the remedy of an aggrieved applicant is to apply in writing to the Registrar within seven days to place the matter before a full court, not to file a fresh motion for leave
  • A party aggrieved by the dismissal of a motion by a single judge must seek reinstatement of that motion rather than bringing a new application attacking an earlier ruling

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The motion dated 28th June, 2018 is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 4
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 55(1)(b)
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 56
On appeal from
Court of Appeal (single judge, Musinga, JA)
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 4 and 55(1)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jacinta Wanza Makenzi v Agnes Mutinda Kithusi & 4 others [2019] KECA 599 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Motion dated 28th June, 2018 (Court of Appeal, Civil Application - number not stated in the judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2019/599/eng@2019-06-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.