Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal No. 146 of 2018· [2019] KECA 290 (KLR)

Dr. Symon Wairagu Githae v Albert Njeru Githae

Court of Appeal
11 October 2019
1,438 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal ruled that an oral will is invalid unless the maker dies within three months, so estranged children cannot be cut out of an intestate estate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the judgment of Muchelule, J in Nairobi Succession Cause No. 1106 of 2010 concerning the estate of the late Cyrus Mbere Githinji, who died in April 2009. The deceased's sons, the appellant Dr. Symon Wairagu Githae and the respondent Albert Njeru Githae, had been appointed joint administrators, but each filed competing proposed distributions, leading the High Court to order equal division of the estate among the deceased's children, with the share of a predeceased daughter going to her children. The appellant, supported by a sister and a clan member, contended that the deceased made an oral will on 9th February, 2008 excluding the respondent owing to bad blood, including the respondent's use of the deceased's title as security for an unpaid loan, a judgment against him, and an attempted killing charge. The respondent countered that the oral will was invalid because the deceased died fourteen months after it was allegedly made. Applying the Selle v Association of Motor Boat Co. principles that a first appeal is a retrial, the Court of Appeal held that section 9(1)(b) of the Law of Succession Act renders an oral will invalid unless the testator dies within three months of making it; the deceased died more than a year later, so the oral will was invalid and the deceased died intestate. Under section 38, the estate devolves equally among the surviving children, and the law does not permit exclusion of a child for familial estrangement absent a valid will. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs given the filial relations between the parties.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of the alleged oral will

Holding

The alleged oral will was invalid because the deceased died more than three months after it was made, contrary to section 9(1)(b) of the Law of Succession Act.

Reasoning

Section 9(1)(b) provides that no oral will shall be valid unless the testator dies within three months from the date of making it. The deceased allegedly made the oral will on 9th February, 2008 but died on 28th April, 2009, more than a year later. The exception for members of the armed forces or merchant marine on active service did not apply. The oral will therefore could not stand, and the deceased died intestate.

p. 2
02

Distribution on intestacy and exclusion of a child

Holding

Having died intestate, the estate devolves equally on the surviving children under section 38; the court cannot exclude a child because of bad blood or the deceased's alleged wishes absent a valid will.

Reasoning

Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act applies where an intestate leaves surviving children but no spouse, mandating equal division among the surviving children. The respondent's conduct, including the alleged attempt to kill the deceased and failure to contribute to funeral expenses, does not provide a lawful ground for exclusion. Exclusion is only possible where stated in a valid will, which was not established. The trial judge's equal distribution was therefore affirmed.

p. 2
03

Standard of determination on a first appeal

Holding

A first appeal is by way of retrial; the Court of Appeal must reconsider and evaluate the evidence and draw its own conclusions, making allowance for not having seen or heard the witnesses.

Reasoning

The court adopted the classic principles in Selle v Association of Motor Boat Co. of Kenya, restating that the Court of Appeal is not bound by the trial judge's findings of fact where he failed to take account of particular circumstances or probabilities or where the impression of a witness's demeanor is inconsistent with the evidence generally. This frames the court's power of review on a first appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An oral will is invalid where the testator does not die within three months of making it, as required by section 9(1)(b) of the Law of Succession Act.
  • Where an intestate leaves children but no spouse, the net intestate estate is divided equally among the surviving children under section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, and the law does not permit exclusion of a child for familial estrangement absent a valid will.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Succession Cause No. 1106 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal under the Law of Succession Act / appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dr. Symon Wairagu Githae v Albert Njeru Githae", Case Analysis (2019). Civil Appeal No. 146 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2019/290/eng@2019-10-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.