Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCriminal Appeal No. 85 of 2015· [2018] KECA 652 (KLR)

Wycliffe Wanyonyi Nyongesa v Repulic [2018] KECA 652 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
19 April 2018
428 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal voided a criminal appeal decided by a judge who had been moved to the Environment and Land Court, because he lacked jurisdiction over criminal matters.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal at Eldoret by Wycliffe Wanyonyi Nyongesa against his conviction by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Kitale and sentence of twenty years' imprisonment for defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. His first appeal to the High Court at Kitale (HCCRA No. 132 of 2011) had been dismissed by Obaga J on 27th November 2013. Before delivering judgment on the appeal argued on 4th December 2017, the Court of Appeal noted on its own motion that the judge who had heard the first appeal, Obaga J, had been appointed a judge of the Environment and Land Court by Gazette Notice No. 14346 of 5th October 2012. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Republic v Karissa Chengo & 2 Others [2017] eKLR, which upheld the holding that a judge of the Environment and Land Court is not a judge of the High Court and has no jurisdiction to hear and determine a criminal appeal, the Court held that the first appellate proceedings were a nullity, leaving no proper judgment upon which a second appeal could be founded. The Court declared the High Court proceedings a nullity and remitted the matter to the High Court for the appellant's first appeal to be reheard by a competent judge of the High Court. No order as to costs appears in the judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of an Environment and Land Court judge to hear a first criminal appeal

Holding

The High Court proceedings were a nullity because the judge who heard the first appeal had been appointed to the Environment and Land Court and was not a judge of the High Court; the second appeal therefore cannot proceed on that judgment.

Reasoning

Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Republic v Karissa Chengo & 2 Others, the Court of Appeal held that appointment as a judge of the Environment and Land Court does not confer jurisdiction as a High Court judge. Since the first appellate proceedings were conducted by such a judge, they are a nullity and there is no valid judgment to ground a second appeal. The only remedy is to declare the proceedings null and remit the matter for a rehearing before a competent judge.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A judge of the Environment and Land Court is not a judge of the High Court and has no jurisdiction to hear and determine a criminal appeal; proceedings before such a judge on a first criminal appeal are a nullity.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the proceedings in the High Court were a nullity
  2. 2.Remittal of the matter to the High Court for the appellant's first appeal to be reheard by a competent judge of the High Court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006section 8(1) as read with section 8(3)

Cases cited (1)

  • Republic vs Karissa Chengo & 2 Others
    [2017] eKLR
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kitale
HCCRA No. 132 of 2011
Jurisdiction invoked
Second appeal under the Criminal Procedure Code (from conviction and sentence under section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Wycliffe Wanyonyi Nyongesa v Repulic [2018] KECA 652 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Criminal Appeal No. 85 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2018/652/eng@2018-04-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.