Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedElection Petition Appeal No. 5 of 2018· [2018] KECA 423 (KLR)

Nyutu Peter Kamau v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2018] KECA 423 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
31 July 2018
4,642 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal threw out an election appeal because the notice was filed in the wrong court registry and no allegations of election misconduct were actually proved.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Nyutu Peter Kamau, who finished seventh with 2,767 votes in the Mbeere South Constituency parliamentary election of 8th August 2017, petitioned the High Court at Embu challenging the election of Muturi Geoffrey King'angi, alleging denial of agents' access to polling stations, bribery, violence, witchcraft and irregularities in Forms 35A, and seeking scrutiny, a recount and nullification. Limo, J. dismissed the petition on 14th February 2018 with costs. On appeal, the Court of Appeal (Makhandia, Sichale and Kantai, JJ.A.) raised, on its own motion, the competence of the appeal because the Notice of Appeal had been lodged at the High Court registry at Embu rather than in the registry of the Court of Appeal, as required by rule 6 of the Court of Appeal (Election Petition) Rules, 2017, and because the notice did not state the grounds of appeal. Relying on its recent decision in Musa Cherutich Sirma and on Supreme Court authority that a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite and that Article 159(2)(d) is not a panacea for procedural shortfalls, the court held the appeal incompetent: without a valid Notice of Appeal the appeal does not lie. The court nevertheless considered the merits, holding that the Elections Act confines it to issues of law, and found the memorandum of appeal fraught with matters of fact. On the evidence, none of the allegations in the petition were proved: the appellant's witnesses lacked credibility and gave no direct evidence, his agents had in fact signed Forms 35A, and no bribery or violence was established. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents, affirming the High Court judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competence of an appeal where the Notice of Appeal was filed in the wrong registry

Holding

The Notice of Appeal lodged at the High Court of Kenya, Embu rather than in the registry of the Court of Appeal was incompetent; without a valid Notice of Appeal the appeal does not lie, and the jurisdictional defect is not cured by Article 159 of the Constitution.

Reasoning

Rule 6 of the Court of Appeal (Election Petition) Rules, 2017 requires the notice of appeal to be lodged in the registry of the Court of Appeal within seven days. Filing a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite; a court's jurisdiction flows from the Constitution, statute or precedent, and without jurisdiction a court downs its tools. Article 159(2)(d) is not a panacea for procedural shortfalls and applies on a case-by-case basis. Following its own recent ruling in Musa Cherutich Sirma, the court held the appeal incompetent.

p. 6
02

Limits of appellate jurisdiction over factual findings in election petitions

Holding

The memorandum of appeal was fraught with matters of fact which the court had no jurisdiction to entertain, the Elections Act limiting it to issues of law only.

Reasoning

The twelve grounds of appeal questioned both legal and factual findings of the trial Judge. The court reaffirmed that under the Elections Act its review of election petition appeals is confined to questions of law. The appellant's complaints about credibility of witnesses, alterations to Forms 35A and failure to call agents were matters of fact and evidence evaluated by the trial court, which the appellate court could not revisit.

p. 7
03

Burden of proving electoral irregularities, bribery and denial of agents' access

Holding

The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving the allegations in the petition; the trial Judge's dismissal of the petition was correct.

Reasoning

The appellant's witnesses gave no direct evidence of any wrongdoing: the campaign manager witnessed no bribery; one witness admitted receiving money for transport and recanted; another hostile witness saw nothing. Agents alleged to have been denied entry were never called, and Forms 35A bore their signatures showing they were present. The Returning Officer explained the apparent discrepancies in the forms as artefacts of photocopying, with alterations counter-signed by presiding officers and agents. No evidence of bribery or violence was adduced.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • In an election petition appeal, the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction only over issues of law; issues of fact are outside its jurisdiction.
  • A Notice of Appeal in an election petition appeal must be filed in the registry of the Court of Appeal within seven days of the decision appealed against; a notice lodged in the High Court registry is incompetent and the appeal does not lie.
  • Where there is a conflict between the Court of Appeal (Election Petition) Rules, 2017 and the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 on election petition appeals, the 2017 Rules prevail.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal awarded to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159 (including Article 159(2)(d))
  • Elections ActNo. 24 of 2011 (generally)
  • Election Offences Actnot specified
  • Appellate Jurisdiction ActCap 9 Laws of Kenya
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017Rule 12(1) and (2)
  • Court of Appeal (Election Petition) Rules, 2017Rules 4(2), 4(3), 6(1)-(5), Form EPA 1
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010relating to civil appeals
  • Elections (General) Regulations, 2012not specified
  • Elections (Technology) Regulations, 2017not specified

Cases cited (5)

  • Musa Cherutich Sirma vs. Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission & 2 Others
    Election Petition Appeal No. 9 of 2018 (Nakuru)
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another vs. Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 Others
    Supreme Court Civil Application No. 2 of 2011 (UR)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo arap Korir Salat vs. Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 7 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Silverbrand V County of Los Angeles
    [2009] 46 Cal. 4th 106, 113
  • Raila Odinga & 5 others vs. Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 5 others
    [2013] eKLR
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Embu
Petition No. 3 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Elections Act (No. 24 of 2011) - appeals from election petitions to the Court of Appeal on issues of law only; appeal initiated under the Court of Appeal (Election Petition) Rules, 2017

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nyutu Peter Kamau v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2018] KECA 423 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Election Petition Appeal No. 5 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2018/423/eng@2018-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.