Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application No. Nai. 49 of 2012· [2016] KECA 216 (KLR)

Erick Mungai Kinyanjui & 3 others v Lucy Wanjiku Nganga & 1 other

Court of Appeal
16 September 2016
709 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal granted a family extra time to file an appeal because the court itself delayed in providing court proceedings.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge (in chambers) ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi on an application under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules by four applicants seeking extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal, memorandum and record of appeal, and deeming of a notice of appeal filed on 28th June 2011, in an intended appeal from a ruling of the High Court (Wanjiru Karanja, J.) dated 16th June 2011 in H.C. Succession Cause No. 1935 of 2000. The application was unopposed in substance: the respondents' advocate sought an adjournment to file written submissions, which the court declined as unmerited. The court restated the settled test that extension of time is an unfettered discretionary remedy exercised to avoid injustice or hardship, taking into account the length of and reason for delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and the prejudice to the respondent, citing Pan African Paper Mills (E.A.) Ltd v Olaka [2001] KLR 8. The notice of appeal had been filed in time, and the roughly two-month delay in obtaining certified proceedings was attributable to the court, not the applicants. Although no draft memorandum of appeal was exhibited to show the appeal's merits, the court held that omission alone could not disentitle the applicants. Extension of time was granted, the notice of appeal deemed filed in time, the memorandum and record of appeal to be filed and served within fourteen days, with each party bearing their own costs. The decision does not disturb the High Court ruling; it merely admits the intended appeal for processing.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether delay occasioned by the court's late supply of proceedings disentitles an applicant from extension of time

Holding

Delay attributable to the court in supplying certified proceedings cannot be faulted against the applicants; extension of time was warranted notwithstanding absence of a draft memorandum.

Reasoning

The applicants filed the notice of appeal in time and promptly applied for certified copies. The two-month delay in supply of proceedings was not their fault. Although no draft memorandum was exhibited to demonstrate the appeal's merits, that omission alone could not defeat an otherwise meritorious application. The court exercised its discretion under rule 4 to avoid injustice, applying the Pan African Paper Mills factors.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An application for extension of time is governed by the court's unfettered discretion, exercised to avoid injustice, considering the length of and reason for delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and prejudice to the respondent.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Extension of time granted to file and serve notice of appeal, memorandum and record of appeal as sought
  2. 2.The notice of appeal filed on 28th June, 2011 deemed duly filed in time
  3. 3.Memorandum and record of appeal to be filed and served within fourteen (14) days from the date of the ruling
  4. 4.Each party to bear their own costs of the application
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
H.C. Succession Cause No. 1935 of 2000
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Erick Mungai Kinyanjui & 3 others v Lucy Wanjiku Nganga & 1 other", Case Analysis (2016). Civil Application No. Nai. 49 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2016/216/eng@2016-09-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.