Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application No. Nai. 176 of 2015 (UR 142/2015)· [2015] KECA 265 (KLR)

Kiama Wangai v Egerton University [2015] KECA 265 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
30 October 2015
1,188 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that you cannot stay a High Court decision that simply refuses an order, because refusal creates nothing to enforce or halt.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Prof. Kiama Wangai, a lecturer at Egerton University, was invited by letter dated 6th March 2014 to appear before the University's Disciplinary Committee to answer charges including insubordination, neglect of duty and sexual harassment. Rather than attend, he obtained ex parte leave in the High Court at Nakuru for judicial review orders of certiorari, the leave operating as a stay of the disciplinary proceedings. At the substantive hearing, Mulwa, J dismissed his motion, holding that the University had made no decision capable of being quashed and had not breached natural justice. Pending an intended appeal, the applicant moved the Court of Appeal under sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules for stay of execution of the High Court ruling and a stay of the disciplinary proceedings. The University opposed, arguing that the High Court order was negative and incapable of stay, that the injunction sought was extraneous to the ruling, and that the application was an abuse of process given existing stays in other proceedings. Applying the settled Rule 5(2)(b) principles as stated in Ishmael Kagunyi Thande v Housing Finance of Kenya Ltd, and relying on Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v Oranga, the court held it unnecessary to consider arguability because the orders sought could not be granted: a negative order cannot be executed or stayed, and conservatory orders by way of injunction were extraneous to the ruling appealed from. The court dismissed the motion dated 25th June 2015 with costs to the respondent. Visram, Mwilu and Kantai, JJ.A delivered a single unanimous ruling on 30th October 2015.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a negative judicial review order can be stayed under Rule 5(2)(b)

Holding

It cannot; a negative order declining certiorari leaves nothing capable of execution or stay.

Reasoning

The High Court had declined to quash the invitation to the disciplinary committee. Because dismissal of a judicial review motion issues no executable order, there is nothing for the Court of Appeal to stay. The court relied on Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v Oranga for this proposition and declined to reach the question of arguability.

p. 2
02

Whether the court could grant conservatory orders by way of injunction restraining the disciplinary proceedings

Holding

No, because such orders are extraneous to the High Court ruling which did not deal with the disciplinary proceedings as such.

Reasoning

The court accepted the University's submission that an injunction of the kind sought does not emanate from the ruling under appeal, which simply responded to a certiorari application. The relief sought was therefore not properly tethered to the decision below, and the application was dismissed with costs.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under Rule 5(2)(b) must show both an arguable appeal and that the appeal will be rendered nugatory unless stay or injunction is granted
  • A negative order of the High Court is incapable of execution and therefore incapable of being stayed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the motion dated 25th June, 2015 with costs to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Appellate Jurisdiction Actsections 3A and 3B
  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)

Cases cited (4)

  • Ishmael Kagunyi Thande vs Housing Finance of Kenya Ltd
    Civil Application No. Nai. 157 of 2006 (unreported)
  • Githunguri vs Jimba Credit Corporation Ltd, No 2
    (1988) KLR 838
  • J. K. Industries Ltd vs Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
    (1982-88)
  • Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences vs Oranga
    [1976] KLR 63
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nakuru
Judicial Review Misc. Civil Appl. No. 9 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kiama Wangai v Egerton University [2015] KECA 265 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Civil Application No. Nai. 176 of 2015 (UR 142/2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2015/265/eng@2015-10-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.