Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealStruck OutCivil Appeal No. 137 of 2014· [2014] KECA 315 (KLR)

Omwenga & 2 others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & another (Civil Appeal (Application) 137 of 2014) [2014] KECA 315 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
17 October 2014
3,237 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed there is no second appeal in election disputes, striking out the appeal because the law grants only one appeal to the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Before the hearing of Civil Appeal No. 137 of 2014, the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission moved under Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules for the appeal to be struck out on the jurisdictional ground that the Elections Act, Cap. 7 provides no second appeal to the Court of Appeal. The appellants, whose original election petition in the Chief Magistrate's Court had been dismissed and whose first appeal to the High Court under Section 75(4) had also failed, argued that Article 164(3) of the Constitution conferred jurisdiction, contending that the absence of a rule allowing second appeals did not prohibit them. The Court framed a single question: whether, absent express statutory conferment, it could entertain such an appeal. Applying the Lillian 'S' doctrine and the Supreme Court's advisory opinion in the Interim Independent Electoral Commission matter, the Court held that jurisdiction flows only from the Constitution and statute and cannot be assumed by interpretive craft. Relying on Munene v Republic, it affirmed that there is no right of appeal apart from statute. Section 75(4) deliberately grants only one appeal, on matters of law, with strict timelines reflecting Parliament's intention that finality and expedition crystallise in electoral disputes. The Court cited Nigerian and American authority that proceedings without jurisdiction are nullities liable to collateral attack. Allowing the Commission's motion, the three-judge bench struck out the appeal and ordered the appellants to pay the costs of the appeal to the respondents and of the motion to the Commission.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a second appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from the High Court's appellate decision in an electoral petition under Section 75(4) of the Elections Act

Holding

No appeal lies; the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal in electoral matters absent express statutory conferment.

Reasoning

The right of appeal and the jurisdiction of an appellate court exist only by express statutory donation. Section 75(4) grants a single appeal to the High Court on matters of law, with strict timelines designed to secure finality and expedition in electoral disputes. The absence of any provision for a second appeal is deliberate, and the Court may not arrogate undonated jurisdiction, which would subvert finality and prolong electoral anxiety. The Court accordingly downed its tools and struck out the appeal.

p. 4
02

The foundational character of jurisdiction and the effect of its absence on judicial decisions

Holding

Jurisdiction is everything; a court without jurisdiction must stop, and judgments rendered without jurisdiction are nullities, void and liable to collateral attack.

Reasoning

Drawing on the Lillian 'S' doctrine, the Supreme Court's advisory opinion in the Interim Independent Electoral Commission case, and comparative and foreign authorities including Nigerian and American decisions and Macfoy v United Africa Co., the Court reaffirmed that jurisdiction flows from the law and cannot be assumed by judicial craft. A decision made without jurisdiction binds no one and may be impeached collaterally, as the Court itself had recently done in Nguruman Ltd v Shompole Group Ranch.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • There is no right of appeal apart from express statutory conferment; a court cannot assume jurisdiction not donated by the Constitution or statute.
  • Where a court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter, its proceedings are nullities and may be collaterally attacked in any court.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The motion by the Commission dated 2nd July 2014 is granted
  2. 2.Civil Appeal No. 137 of 2014 is struck out
  3. 3.The appellants shall pay the costs of the appeal to the respondents and of the motion to the Commission

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 84
  • Elections Act, Cap. 7Section 75(4)
  • Elections Act, Cap. 7Section 85A
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 164(3)

Cases cited (13)

  • Owners of The Motor Vessel Lillian 'S' v Caltex Oil Kenya Ltd
    [1989] KLR 1 at p 14
  • Re: The matter of the Interim Independent Electoral Commission
    [2011] eKLR
  • Stoll v Gottlieb
    [1938] 305 U.S. 165
  • Munene v The Republic (No. 2)
    [1978] KLR 105
  • Evans v Oregon Short R.R. Co.
    [1915] 51 Mont. 107, 112
  • Elliot et al v The Lessee of Piersol et al
    [1828], 1 PET. 328, T.L.ED. 164
  • Old Wayne Mut. L. Ass. v McDonough
    204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct
  • Dillon v Dillon
    187 P 27
  • Norwood v Renfield
    34 C 329
  • Ex Parte Giambonini
    49 P 732
  • Dapialong v Dariye
    [2007] 4. SC (PT 111) 118
  • Nguruman Ltd v Shompole Group Ranch & Anor
    [2014] eKLR
  • Macfoy v United Africa Co. Ltd
    [1961] 3 All ER 1169 at 1172
On appeal from
High Court
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules; jurisdictional question considered under Article 164(3) of the Constitution and Section 75(4) of the Elections Act, Cap. 7

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Omwenga & 2 others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & another (Civil Appeal (Application) 137 of 2014) [2014] KECA 315 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Civil Appeal No. 137 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2014/315/eng@2014-10-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.