Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Appeal 168 of 2009· [2013] KECA 324 (KLR)

Miriam Njoki Muturi v Bilha Wahito Muturi (Civil Appeal 168 of 2009) [2013] KECA 324 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
16 May 2013
3,106 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that a woman in a customary union is a legal wife for inheritance, even where her husband also had a statutory marriage.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Court of Appeal at Nyeri (Koome, Musinga and Ouko, JJA) allowed a first appeal against the decision of Kasango, J. in a succession cause in which the High Court had dismissed the appellant's protest and confirmed a grant distributing the deceased's entire estate to the respondent as the sole widow. The only issue tried by consent was whether the appellant was a wife of the deceased. The High Court found no evidence of marriage, noting that the customary rites and the amount of dowry paid were not stated. Allowing the appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the evidence of continuous cohabitation from 1994, the payment of some dowry, recognition by the local chief as the deceased's second wife, and the deceased's brother's testimony proved on a balance of probabilities that the appellant was the deceased's second wife. Her relationship fell within section 3(5) of the Law of Succession Act, which recognizes as a wife a woman married under a system permitting polygamy notwithstanding her husband's prior monogamous marriage. The Court also held that there is no fixed amount or time for paying dowry, relying on the presumption of marriage under section 119 of the Evidence Act and the Githatu decision. The orders of 14th May 2009 were set aside and a joint grant of letters of administration was ordered to issue to both widows, with liberty to apply for confirmation and distribution under section 40 of the Act dealing with polygamous households. The question of the appellant's children was left for the High Court to verify. As a family matter, each party was to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether cohabitation coupled with partial payment of dowry established a customary marriage despite the deceased's subsisting statutory marriage

Holding

Yes. The appellant's relationship fell within section 3(5) of the Law of Succession Act, and on the totality of the evidence she was proved on a balance of probabilities to be the second wife of the deceased.

Reasoning

The Court found uncontroverted evidence of continuous cohabitation from 1994 until the deceased's death, confirmed by the deceased's brother and admitted by the respondent, recognition by the chief as a second wife, and payment of some dowry. The trial judge's insistence on a stated amount of dowry was an error since no fixed amount is payable. Section 3(5) expressly covers women in such unions notwithstanding a prior monogamous marriage.

p. 5
02

Whether the absence of a stated dowry amount defeated the claim of customary marriage

Holding

No. There is no standard set amount payable for dowry; it may be paid in installments or even after a party's death.

Reasoning

Following Mary Wanjiru Githatu v Esther Wanjiru Kiarie, the Court held that cohabitation, provision of residence and maintenance are essentials of a Kikuyu customary marriage, and dowry may be paid in installments or even after death. The trial judge therefore misdirected herself in rejecting the claim merely because the dowry amount was not quantified.

p. 4
03

How the estate of a person with a statutory wife and a customary wife should be administered and distributed

Holding

Letters of administration should issue jointly to both widows and the estate distributed under section 40 of the Law of Succession Act governing polygamous households.

Reasoning

Having found the appellant to be a wife, the Court set aside the confirmation orders which had allocated the entire estate to the respondent alone, ordered a joint grant, and directed distribution under section 40. The question of which of the appellant's children belonged to the deceased was left for verification by the High Court before confirmation.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A woman married under a system of law permitting polygamy is a wife for purposes of the Law of Succession Act notwithstanding her husband's previous or subsequent monogamous marriage, and her children are children within the meaning of the Act
  • Courts may presume marriage from prolonged cohabitation under section 119 of the Evidence Act, and dowry need not be paid in a fixed amount or at a fixed time to sustain a Kikuyu customary marriage
  • An appellate court on a first appeal must re-evaluate the evidence and arrive at its own conclusion while allowing for the fact that it did not see or hear the witnesses

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal allowed
  2. 2.Orders of the High Court of 14th May 2009 set aside
  3. 3.Grant of letters of administration to be issued jointly to the respondent and the appellant
  4. 4.Both parties at liberty to apply for confirmation of the grant, either jointly or severally
  5. 5.Appellant to provide a list of the children sired by the deceased and each party to prepare an inventory of the deceased's assets
  6. 6.The deceased's estate to be distributed in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act dealing with polygamous households
  7. 7.Each party to bear their own costs of the appeal and the suit in the High Court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession Actsection 3(5)
  • Law of Succession Actsection 29
  • Law of Succession Actsection 40
  • Probate & Administration RulesRule 21
  • Evidence Act, Cap 80 Laws of Kenyasection 119
  • Act No. 10 of 1995amendment introducing section 3(5) of the Law of Succession Act

Cases cited (4)

  • Peters v Sunday Post Limited
    [1958] EA 429
  • Irene Njeri Macharia vs. Margaret Wairimu Njomo & Another
    CA No. 139 of 1994
  • In the matter of the Estate of Reuben Nzioka Mutua (Deceased)
    P&A Cause No. 843 of 1986
  • Mary Wanjiru Githatu v. Esther Wanjiru Kiarie
    CA No. 20 of 2009
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nyeri
H.C. Succ Cause No. 76 of 2004
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal under the Law of Succession Act and appellate jurisdiction over the High Court in succession causes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (9)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Miriam Njoki Muturi v Bilha Wahito Muturi (Civil Appeal 168 of 2009) [2013] KECA 324 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Civil Appeal 168 of 2009. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2013/324/eng@2013-05-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.