Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application No. 292 of 2006· [2007] KECA 410 (KLR)

John Elloy O. Nyasoro v National Bank Of Kenya Limited (? 292 of 2006) [2007] KECA 410 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
2 March 2007
499 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to pause execution of a Shs.14 million judgment because the bank could simply refund the money if the appeal later succeeded.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an interlocutory application before the Court of Appeal at Nakuru under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, seeking a stay of execution of a judgment of the High Court (Luka Kimaru, J) dated 15 June 2006 in HCCC No. 374 of 1995, by which the applicant was ordered to pay the National Bank of Kenya Shs.14,104,129/60 with interest at 21% per annum, pending the hearing of Nakuru Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2006. A single-judge panel of three Judges of Appeal (Tunoi, Bosire and Githinji, JA) restated the settled twin principles: the applicant must show the appeal is arguable and that it will be rendered nugatory unless stay is granted. On the first limb the court accepted, on a prima facie basis, that the appeal was arguable, given the contention that the sum awarded, the interest rate, and the quantum were neither pleaded nor supported by evidence. On the second limb the application failed: although the applicant alleged hardship because the bank held his title documents, his own counsel conceded that the respondent, being a bank, could refund the decretal amount if the appeal succeeded. The court therefore dismissed the application with costs to the respondent. The decision affirms that refundability of the decretal sum by a financially capable respondent defeats the nugatory-ness limb of a stay application, and it did not disturb the High Court's judgment, which remains in force and executable.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal is arguable

Holding

The applicant established a prima facie arguable appeal on the grounds that the sum awarded was not pleaded, the 21% interest rate was never pleaded, and the amount was unsupported by evidence.

Reasoning

The court reiterated that the discretion to grant stay must be exercised judicially. On the first limb, it found the applicant's grounds - that the decretal sum of Shs.14,104,129/60, the 21% interest rate, and the quantum were neither pleaded nor supported by evidence - sufficient to show a prima facie arguable appeal.

p. 2
02

Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent a stay

Holding

The nugatory limb failed because the respondent, a bank, conceded by the applicant's own counsel to be capable of refunding the decretal amount if the appeal succeeded.

Reasoning

The court held that even where an appeal is arguable, stay will be refused unless the applicant demonstrates the appeal would be rendered nugatory. Here the applicant alleged hardship because the respondent held his title documents, but counsel conceded the bank could refund the decretal sum, so the appeal would not be rendered nugatory if execution proceeded.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay under Rule 5(2)(b) must show both that the appeal is arguable and that it will be rendered nugatory unless stay is granted; failure on either limb is fatal.
  • The nugatory limb is not satisfied where the respondent is demonstrably able to refund the decretal amount if the appeal ultimately succeeds.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application for stay of execution dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal RulesRule 5(2)(b)
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nakuru
H.C.C.C. No. 374 of 1995
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Elloy O. Nyasoro v National Bank Of Kenya Limited (? 292 of 2006) [2007] KECA 410 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2007). Civil Application No. 292 of 2006. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2007/410/eng@2007-03-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.