Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealStruck OutCivil Appeal No. 111 of 1995· [1996] KECA 15 (KLR)

Kenya Commercial Bank Limited v Fisco (kenya) Limited & 1 other

Court of Appeal
14 January 1996
0 words in judgment
View original judgment Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal struck out KCB's appeal because it was filed too late, leaving the 1990 High Court decision against the bank standing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a one-page order of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi in Civil Appeal No. 111 of 1995, an appeal by Kenya Commercial Bank Limited against an order of the High Court (Justice Shields) dated 5 February 1990 in Consolidated CC. No. 2523 of 1983 and 533 of 1982, in which Fisco (Kenya) Limited and Paul Okelo Abajah were respondents. The appeal was a companion to Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1995. Rather than reproducing its reasoning, the court expressly adopted the reasons it gave in that companion appeal, holding that this appeal was 'also' out of time. The court struck out the appeal and made no order as to costs. The judgment was delivered on 14 January 1996 by a bench of Gicheru, Shah and Lakha JJ.A., sitting as a single court with no separate opinions and no dissent. Because the substantive reasons reside in Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1995, this order itself contains no extended analysis of the law; its binding significance lies in the treatment of an appeal filed out of time without an effective extension, and in the outcome: the appeal never proceeded to a hearing on the merits, and the High Court order of 5 February 1990 was left undisturbed. No authorities or statutory provisions are cited in this order.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an appeal lodged out of time without a valid extension of time can proceed

Holding

The appeal was out of time and was struck out, adopting the reasons given by the same court in the companion appeal, Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1995

Reasoning

This one-page order incorporates by reference the court's reasons in Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1995, a companion appeal between the same parties. The court treated this appeal as 'also' out of time and, applying the same reasoning, struck it out. The substantive reasoning for refusing to entertain the out-of-time appeal resides in the companion judgment, not in this order.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal filed out of time will be struck out where no extension of time has been granted, consistent with the court's reasoning in the companion appeal Civil Appeal No. 110 of 1995

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is struck out as out of time
  2. 2.No order as to costs
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Consolidated CC. No. 2523 of 1983 & 533 of 1982
Jurisdiction invoked
Appeal to the Court of Appeal under the Constitution of Kenya and the Appellate Jurisdiction Act (provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Commercial Bank Limited v Fisco (kenya) Limited & 1 other", Case Analysis (1996). Civil Appeal No. 111 of 1995. Source: 

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.