Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealStruck OutCivil Appeal No. 42 of 1995· [1995] KECA 66 (KLR)

Augustino Mwai v Okumu Ndede [1995] KECA 66 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
25 October 1995
236 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal struck out an entire appeal because the lawyers missed deadlines for serving appeal papers — missing appeal deadlines can kill your case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a short interlocutory ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Omolo, Akiwumi and Tunoi, JJ.A.) in Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1995, arising from an intended appeal against the judgment of Justice Dugdale in H.C.C.C. No. 5478 of 1991 delivered on 27 October 1994. The respondent applied to strike out the appeal, an application filed and served as far back as June 1995. The court allowed the application on the basis of the appellant's own concessions: the Notice of Appeal was served on the respondent out of time, and no application had been made to extend the time for such service. In addition, the respondent was not served with the record of appeal within the prescribed time; instead, on 19 October 1995 and without leave, the record of appeal was simply posted to the respondent, which the court held 'will not do'. The court struck out the appeal and awarded the respondent the costs of the application. As an interlocutory ruling on procedural non-compliance, it establishes binding appellate practice that strict compliance with the time limits for serving the Notice of Appeal and the record of appeal is required, and that posting a record without leave is not valid service. The High Court decision below was not disturbed on the merits; the appeal never proceeded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Consequences of non-compliance with time limits for service of the Notice of Appeal

Holding

Where the Notice of Appeal is served out of time and no application to extend time has been made, the appeal is liable to be struck out.

Reasoning

The appellants conceded that the Notice of Appeal was served out of time and that no application for extension of time had been made. The court treated this non-compliance, together with the late and unauthorised posting of the record of appeal, as incurable defects justifying striking out the appeal on the respondent's application.

p. 1
02

Service of the record of appeal without leave and out of time

Holding

Posting the record of appeal to the respondent out of time and without leave does not constitute valid service under the applicable rules.

Reasoning

The court noted the concession that the respondent was never served with the record of appeal within the prescribed time and that, on 19 October 1995, the record was merely posted to the respondent without leave. The court held that this mode of service 'will not do', reinforcing that strict compliance with appellate procedural rules is required.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Service of the Notice of Appeal out of time, without an extension of time, is fatal to an appeal and justifies striking it out.
  • Posting the record of appeal to a respondent out of time and without leave does not comply with the rules on service of the record of appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application to strike out the appeal is allowed
  2. 2.The appeal is struck out
  3. 3.The respondent is awarded the costs of the application
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
H.C.C.C. No. 5478 of 1991
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal over the High Court (Civil Appeal), on a striking-out application under the Court of Appeal procedural rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Augustino Mwai v Okumu Ndede [1995] KECA 66 (KLR)", Case Analysis (1995). Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1995. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/1995/66/eng@1995-10-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.