Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Application NAI 51 of 1985· [1986] KECA 8 (KLR)

ATTORNEY GENERAL v GEOFREY NDUNGU THEURI [1986] KECA 8 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
30 January 1986
1,223 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan courts confirm self-represented litigants who win can recover their actual expenses, but not imaginary lawyer's fees.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of a full bench of the Court of Appeal (Kneller, Hancox and Nyarangi, JJ A) on a reference by Mr Theuri, a litigant in person, seeking costs after successfully persuading the court to reverse a decision of a single judge of appeal refusing extension of time to lodge a notice of appeal. The court held that although the Rules define 'application' and 'appeal' so as not to include a 'reference', a reference is in effect just another application and the Deputy Registrar is its taxing officer. Mr Theuri, not being an advocate, could not invoke the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. The court noted that England's order 62 rule 28A allows a successful litigant in person to recover up to two-thirds of notional solicitor's costs, but Kenya has no equivalent provision, which the court respectfully drew to the rules committee's attention, stressing that it applies and does not create law. Applying section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held the respondent entitled to an indemnity against costs actually, necessarily and properly incurred, including reasonable attendance expenses, but not notional advocate's fees. No order could be made against the Council of Legal Education or the Kenya School of Law as they were not parties. The court fixed the costs of both the application and the reference at a lump sum of Kshs 1,200.00 to avoid further taxation or references. The ruling binds subordinate courts and the High Court on the costs entitlement of litigants in person.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entitlement of a litigant in person to costs

Holding

A successful litigant in person may recover the expenses necessarily and properly incurred, including attendance expenses, but not notional fees for an advocate

Reasoning

The court traced the costs provisions of the Court of Appeal Rules, holding that a reference is an application for taxation purposes. The Third Schedule para 19 allows reasonable expenses of a party appearing in person. Section 27(1) Civil Procedure Act makes costs follow the event. Unlike England's order 62 rule 28A, Kenya has no rule allowing recovery of a fraction of notional solicitor's costs, and the court cannot create such law.

p. 2
02

Whether the court could award costs against third bodies

Holding

No order could be made against the Council of Legal Education, its Secretary or the Principal of the Kenya School of Law as none was a party

Reasoning

Costs can only be ordered against parties to the proceedings before the court. The court suggested the Attorney General decide from which parliamentary vote the costs should be paid.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A reference under rule 54(1) is in effect just another application, and the Deputy Registrar is the taxing officer for its costs as for an appeal or application
  • A successful litigant in person is entitled to an indemnity against costs actually incurred, including reasonable attendance expenses, but not to notional advocate's fees under the Advocates (Remuneration) Order
  • Costs follow the event unless the court or judge for good reason otherwise orders, under section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent is entitled to an indemnity from the Attorney General against costs actually incurred in the application to the single judge and the reference to the full court
  2. 2.Costs limited to amounts necessarily and properly incurred, including reasonable expenses of attendance
  3. 3.Costs for the application and reference fixed together at one sum of Kshs 1,200.00, obviating taxation
On appeal from
Court of Appeal of Kenya (single judge of appeal)
Jurisdiction invoked
Court of Appeal Rules, rule 54(1)(b) - reference against a decision of a single judge of appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "ATTORNEY GENERAL v GEOFREY NDUNGU THEURI [1986] KECA 8 (KLR)", Case Analysis (1986). Civil Application NAI 51 of 1985. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/1986/8/eng@1986-01-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.