Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtAllowedCivil Application 24 of 2018

James Lusweti Mukwe v Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission (IEBC), Benson Esuza Lumwagi & Edward Tale Nabangi

Supreme Court of Kenya
7 September 2018
1,285 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Supreme Court halts fresh election in Kabuchai pending appeal on nullified MP seat.

What this practically means

#

James Lusweti Mukwe was elected MP for Kabuchai in 2017. The Court of Appeal later nullified his election and ordered a fresh vote. Mukwe appealed to the Supreme Court and asked it to stop the new election while his appeal is heard. The Supreme Court agreed, citing that his appeal raised serious issues and that holding a new election would waste public money if he later wins. The IEBC cannot declare the seat vacant or hold a by-election until the appeal is decided.

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2018 filed by James Lusweti Mukwe, the applicant, seeking stay of execution and conservatory orders pending the hearing and determination of his appeal to the Supreme Court. The applicant had been declared the duly elected Member of National Assembly for Kabuchai Constituency in the August 2017 general elections. The 3rd respondent, Mukhwana Wamalwa, challenged the election in the High Court, which dismissed the petition. On appeal, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court judgment, declaring the election invalid, null and void, and ordering a fresh election. The applicant then filed the present application, arguing that he had an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if a stay was not granted, as a certificate would issue declaring his seat vacant and a fresh election would be held, wasting public funds. The 1st and 2nd respondents supported the application, while the 3rd respondent opposed it, arguing that the threshold for stay had not been met. The Supreme Court, drawing from its jurisprudence in Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji and Nathif Jama Adam v Abdikhalim Osman Mohamed, unanimously found that the application met the threshold for grant of stay orders. The Court allowed the application, stayed the Court of Appeal judgment and decree, issued a conservatory order barring IEBC from certifying the seat vacant or conducting a fresh election pending the appeal, and ordered that the costs of the application be subsumed in the appeal cause.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of stay orders pending appeal

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant met the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.

Holding

The Supreme Court held that the applicant met the threshold for grant of stay orders.

Reasoning

The Court considered the application and the contending submissions, and drew from its own jurisprudence in Gatirau Peter Munya and Nathif Jama Adam cases. It found that the applicant had an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay was not granted, as a certificate would issue declaring his election null and void and a fresh election would be held, wasting public funds.

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of execution in election appeals requires an arguable appeal and risk of the appeal being rendered nugatory.
  • The threshold for stay is drawn from the Supreme Court's decisions in Gatirau Peter Munya and Nathif Jama Adam cases.
  • A conservatory order can bar IEBC from certifying a seat vacant or conducting a fresh election pending appeal.
  • Public interest in avoiding wasted public funds is a key factor in granting stay.
  • Costs of a stay application are subsumed in the main appeal costs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2018 is allowed.
  2. 2.The judgment and decree of the Court of Appeal (Githinji, Okwengu & J. Mohammed, JJA) delivered on 26th July 2018 is hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
  3. 3.A Conservatory Order do issue forth, barring the 1st Respondent, IEBC, from certifying the seat of Member of National Assembly, Kabuchai Constituency vacant and proceeding to organize and or conduct a fresh election for Member of National Assembly, Kabuchai Constituency pending the hearing and determination of the Petition of Appeal.
  4. 4.The costs of this application shall be subsumed in the appeal cause.

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
Philomena Mbete Mwilu
P.M. MwiluDCJ
Currently serving
majority
majority
Smokin Charles Wanjala
S. WanjalaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Isaac Lenaola
I. LenaolaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 163(4)(a) of the Constitution

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2018 is allowed.
p. 3 Disposition of the application
The judgment and decree of the Court of Appeal (Githinji, Okwengu & J. Mohammed, JJA) delivered on 26th July 2018 is hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
p. 3 Stay of execution
A Conservatory Order do issue forth, barring the 1st Respondent, IEBC, from certifying the seat of Member of National Assembly, Kabuchai Constituency vacant and proceeding to organize and or conduct a fresh election for Member of National Assembly, Kabuchai Constituency pending the hearing and determination of the Petition of Appeal.
p. 3 Conservatory order
The costs of this application shall be subsumed in the appeal cause.
p. 3 Costs order
Having considered the application and the contending submissions of the parties before the Court, and drawing from this Court’s jurisprudence, particularly in the cases of Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji and two others [2014] eKLR; and Nathif Jama Adam v Abdikhalim Osman Mohamed and three others [2014] eKLR we are of a unanimous opinion that the application meets the threshold for grant of the stay orders sought.
p. 3 Threshold for stay

Key timeline

#
2017-08
General elections; James Lusweti Mukwe declared winner for Kabuchai Constituency.
2018-07-26
Court of Appeal nullifies Mukwe's election and orders a fresh election.
2018-07-30
Mukwe files Notice of Motion in Supreme Court seeking stay of execution and conservatory orders.
2018
Supreme Court allows the application, staying the Court of Appeal judgment and barring IEBC from acting.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Stay threshold in election appeals

When seeking stay pending appeal in election matters, you must demonstrate both an arguable appeal and that the appeal will be rendered nugatory without a stay. Cite Gatirau Peter Munya and Nathif Jama Adam. The court also considers public interest, such as avoiding wasted public funds from a fresh election.

For businesses

Election uncertainty affects investment

Businesses in constituencies with disputed elections face uncertainty. This ruling shows that the Supreme Court can freeze by-elections pending appeal, preventing premature disruption. Companies should monitor such cases to anticipate political stability and plan for potential changes in representation.

For individuals

Voters' representation protected

If you are a voter in a constituency where an MP's election is challenged, your representative remains in office while the appeal is heard. The court can stop a by-election until the final decision, ensuring you are not left without representation during the legal process.

Frequently asked questions

#
What is the threshold for stay of execution in Kenyan election petitions?+

The Supreme Court requires the applicant to show an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted. This was established in Gatirau Peter Munya and Nathif Jama Adam cases.

Can IEBC declare a seat vacant while an appeal is pending in Kenya?+

Not if the Supreme Court issues a conservatory order. In this case, the court barred IEBC from certifying the Kabuchai seat vacant or holding a fresh election until the appeal is heard and determined.

What happened in the Kabuchai constituency election case?+

James Lusweti Mukwe was declared MP after the 2017 elections. The Court of Appeal nullified his win. He appealed to the Supreme Court, which stopped the fresh election pending the appeal outcome.

How does the Supreme Court decide on stay orders in election matters in Kenya?+

The court applies the principles from Gatirau Peter Munya and Nathif Jama Adam: the applicant must have an arguable appeal and the appeal must be at risk of being rendered nugatory. Public interest, like avoiding wasted public funds, is also considered.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Lusweti Mukwe v Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission (IEBC), Benson Esuza Lumwagi & Edward Tale Nabangi", Case Analysis (2018). Civil Application 24 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2018/57/eng@2018-09-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.