Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtDismissedPetition 13 of 2016

Deposit Protection Fund Board (pka the Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation) v Shah & another

Supreme Court of Kenya
7 December 2018
2,929 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Supreme Court cannot hear appeals on constitutional issues raised for the first time at that level.

What this practically means

#

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the liquidator of Trust Bank Limited because the case was a commercial dispute, not a constitutional one. The appellant tried to raise constitutional arguments only at the Supreme Court, but the Court said those issues must have been argued in the lower courts first. Without that, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Each side paid its own costs.

Executive summary

#
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by the liquidator of Trust Bank Limited (in liquidation) against a Court of Appeal decision that had set aside High Court orders holding former directors liable for misfeasance and breach of trust. The appellant sought to invoke the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 163(4)(a) of the Constitution, arguing that the Court of Appeal had violated constitutional rights including fair hearing, equal protection, and national values. The respondents raised a preliminary objection challenging the Court's jurisdiction, contending that the matter was a commercial dispute and no constitutional issues had been raised in the lower courts. The Supreme Court upheld the preliminary objection, finding that the appeal did not involve the interpretation or application of the Constitution as required for an appeal as of right. The Court noted that the litigation history revealed a commercial dispute concerning the winding up of a bank, and the alleged constitutional violations were raised for the first time at the Supreme Court. Citing its precedents in Lawrence Nduttu, Joho, and Samuel Kamau Macharia, the Court held that constitutional issues must have been canvassed in the courts below for an appeal to lie under Article 163(4)(a). The petition was dismissed with each party bearing their own costs.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain and determine this Appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under Article 163(4)(a) where constitutional issues were not raised in the lower courts.

Holding

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction because the constitutional issues were not canvassed in the High Court or Court of Appeal; the matter was a commercial dispute.

Reasoning

The Court examined the litigation history and found the dispute was a commercial matter concerning the winding up of Trust Bank Limited. The appellant alleged constitutional violations (bias, discrimination) only at the Supreme Court stage, but these issues were not raised in the courts below. Citing the Nduttu case and Joho case, the Court held that for an appeal to lie as of right under Article 163(4)(a), the constitutional issues must have been subject of the proceedings in the lower courts and must have progressed through the normal appellate mechanism. The Court found that the appeal did not meet this threshold and therefore lacked jurisdiction.

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 163(4)(a) requires constitutional issues to have been raised and decided in lower courts.
  • Merely alleging a constitutional violation in pleadings does not make a case a constitutional matter.
  • The Supreme Court will not consider constitutional arguments introduced for the first time at the appeal stage.
  • Commercial disputes cannot be converted into constitutional appeals by adding constitutional claims late in the process.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of preliminary objection dated August 12, 2016 is upheld.
  2. 2.The Petition of Appeal No 13 of 2016 is hereby dismissed.
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs.

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
majority
Smokin Charles Wanjala
S. C. WanjalaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Njoki Susanna Ndungu
Njoki NdunguSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Isaac Lenaola
I. LenaolaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
On appeal from
Court of Appeal of Kenya
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 163(4)(a) of the Constitution of Kenya

Relief refused

#

Appeal be allowed

Court lacked jurisdiction

Declarations that the Court of Appeal decision violated constitutional rights

Court lacked jurisdiction

Declaration that the Court of Appeal decision is null and void

Court lacked jurisdiction

Costs of the appeal and costs in the Court of Appeal

Court lacked jurisdiction

Costs

Each party to bear their own costs.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

in order to transmute itself to the provision of article 164(4)(a), the constitutional issues must have been subject of the proceedings in the courts below.
p. 8 Jurisdiction under Article 163(4)(a) requires constitutional issues to have been raised in lower courts
it is not the mere allegation in pleadings by a party that clothes an appeal with the attributes of constitutional interpretation or application.
p. 7 Mere allegation of constitutional issues insufficient for Supreme Court jurisdiction
A look at the litigation history of this matter reveals that it is a commercial dispute touching on the winding up of Trust Bank Limited. It did not raise issues of application or interpretation of the Constitution and cannot purport to at this stage.
p. 8 Nature of dispute determines jurisdiction

Key timeline

#
2016-08-12
Respondents filed a preliminary objection challenging the Supreme Court's jurisdiction.
2016
Supreme Court upheld the objection and dismissed the appeal.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Raise constitutional issues early

When handling appeals to the Supreme Court under Article 163(4)(a), ensure all constitutional arguments are fully canvassed in the High Court and Court of Appeal. Introducing them only at the Supreme Court will result in dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Review your pleadings at every stage to avoid this trap.

For businesses

Commercial disputes stay commercial

If you are involved in a commercial dispute, such as a bank liquidation or director liability case, do not expect to turn it into a constitutional appeal by adding constitutional claims late. The Supreme Court will reject such attempts. Focus on resolving the commercial issues in the appropriate courts.

For individuals

Know your appeal route

If you believe your constitutional rights were violated, you must raise that argument in the first court that hears your case. Waiting until the Supreme Court will mean your appeal is dismissed. Always tell your lawyer about any constitutional issues as early as possible.

Frequently asked questions

#
Can I appeal to the Supreme Court in Kenya on constitutional grounds if I didn't raise them earlier?+

No. The Supreme Court ruled that constitutional issues must be raised and argued in the High Court and Court of Appeal first. If you only mention them at the Supreme Court, your appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

What is Article 163(4)(a) of the Kenyan Constitution?+

It allows appeals as of right to the Supreme Court in cases involving the interpretation or application of the Constitution. But this case confirms that the constitutional issues must have been part of the case from the lower courts, not added later.

Does the Supreme Court in Kenya hear commercial disputes?+

Only if they involve constitutional interpretation or application. A pure commercial dispute, like a bank liquidation, does not qualify for Supreme Court appeal unless constitutional issues were properly raised and decided in the lower courts.

What happens if I file a constitutional appeal in Kenya without raising issues below?+

The Supreme Court will dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. As in this case, the Court upheld a preliminary objection and dismissed the appeal, with each party bearing its own costs.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Deposit Protection Fund Board (pka the Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation) v Shah & another", Case Analysis (2018). Petition 13 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2018/69/eng@2018-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.