Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtPartially AllowedPetition 1 of 2020

Attorney General v Zinj Limited

Supreme Court of Kenya
4 August 2020
1,082 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Supreme Court allowed extension of time to file appeal records, dismissing opponent's strike-out bid.

What this practically means

#

The Supreme Court of Kenya ruled that the government could file its appeal documents late because it gave good reasons for the delay. The court also rejected the other side's request to throw out the appeal entirely. Both sides must pay their own legal costs.

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Supreme Court of Kenya (a six-judge bench) determined two concomitant applications in SC Application No. 5 of 2020. The Petitioner, Republic, sought an extension of time to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal in an intended appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2018). The Respondent, Ahmed Ali Moallim & 2 others, cross-applied to strike out the Petitioner's Record of Appeal, arguing non-compliance with court orders and abuse of process. The court, citing its jurisdiction under Section 21(3) of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 53 of the Supreme Court Rules, applied the principles for extension of time from precedents including Hamida Yaroi Shek Nuri and Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat. It found that the Petitioner had provided reasonable and cogent reasons for the delay and that the Supplementary Record of Appeal, being certified copies of the Court of Appeal record, would not prejudice the Respondent. Consequently, the court allowed the Petitioner's application for extension of time, deemed the Supplementary Record of Appeal as filed, and dismissed the Respondent's application to strike out as lacking merit. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the Petitioner's application for extension of time to file the Supplementary Record of Appeal should be allowed.
  2. 2.Whether the Respondent's application to strike out the Petitioner's Record of Appeal should be allowed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioner satisfied the principles for extension of time to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal.

Holding

Yes, the Petitioner provided reasonable and cogent reasons for the delay, and the filing would not prejudice the Respondent.

Reasoning

The court applied the principles from Hamida Yaroi Shek Nuri, Hassan Nyanje Charo, and Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat, finding that the Petitioner had given reasonable and cogent reasons for the delay and that the Supplementary Record of Appeal, being certified copies of the Court of Appeal record, was not contested and would cause no prejudice to the Respondent.

02

Whether the Respondent's application to strike out the Petitioner's Record of Appeal should be allowed.

Holding

No, the application was dismissed as it would have no merit once the Petitioner's application for extension of time was allowed.

Reasoning

The court reasoned that since the Petitioner's application for extension of time was granted, the Respondent's application to strike out the Record of Appeal became moot and without merit.

Legal principles established

#
  • The Supreme Court has power to extend time for filing appeal records under its rules.
  • An applicant must provide reasonable and cogent reasons for any delay in filing court documents.
  • Extension of time will be granted if it causes no prejudice to the opposing party.
  • A party cannot have its appeal struck out simply because the other side was late in filing documents.
  • Each party bears its own costs when both applications are decided together.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion by the Petitioner dated 3rd February 2020 and filed on 6th February 2020 is hereby allowed.
  2. 2.The Supplementary Record of Appeal is deemed as filed as the Petitioner submitted that it had already filed certified copies of proceedings from the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2018.
  3. 3.The Application by the Respondent dated 26th May 2020 and filed on 3rd June 2020 is hereby dismissed.
  4. 4.Each party shall bear its own costs in both Applications.

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
Philomena Mbete Mwilu
P. M. MwiluDCJ
Currently serving
majority
majority
Smokin Charles Wanjala
S. C. WanjalaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Njoki Susanna Ndungu
Njoki NdunguSCJ
Currently serving
majority
Isaac Lenaola
I. LenaolaSCJ
Currently serving
majority
On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 159(2)(d) & 163(4)(a) of the Constitution

Relief refused

#

Respondent's application to strike out the Petitioner's Record of Appeal

The court found it would have no merit once the Petitioner's application for extension of time was allowed.

Costs

Each party shall bear its own costs in both Applications.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The Notice of Motion by the Petitioner dated 3rd February 2020 and filed on 6th February 2020 is hereby allowed.
p. 4 Extension of time granted
The Application by the Respondent dated 26th May 2020 and filed on 3rd June 2020 is hereby dismissed;
p. 4 Respondent's application dismissed
Each party shall bear its own costs in both Applications.
p. 4 Costs order
the Petitioner has given reasonable and cogent reasons for the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal.
p. 4 Principles for extension of time

Key timeline

#
2020-02-06
Petitioner files Notice of Motion for extension of time to file Supplementary Record of Appeal.
2020-06-03
Respondent files application to strike out the Petitioner's Record of Appeal.
2020
Supreme Court delivers ruling allowing extension of time and dismissing strike-out application.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Extension of time: key principles

When seeking extension of time in the Supreme Court, you must present clear, reasonable reasons for the delay and show no prejudice to the other side. Use precedents like Hamida Yaroi Shek Nuri and Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat. Also, ensure your application is filed promptly after the delay occurs.

For businesses

Court deadlines: flexibility exists

If your business is involved in a Supreme Court appeal and misses a filing deadline, you can still ask for more time if you have a good excuse. The court will consider your reasons and whether the other side will be harmed. This ruling shows that strict deadlines are not absolute.

For individuals

Your rights in appeal delays

If you are a party in a Supreme Court case and the other side files documents late, you cannot automatically have their case thrown out. The court will examine their reasons for the delay. You should still raise objections, but the court may allow the late filing if it is fair.

Frequently asked questions

#
What is extension of time in the Kenyan Supreme Court?+

Extension of time is a court order allowing a party to file documents after the deadline has passed. The Supreme Court can grant it if the applicant shows good reasons for the delay and the other side is not unfairly harmed.

How do I file a supplementary record of appeal in Kenya?+

A supplementary record of appeal is filed to add missing documents to an existing appeal. You must apply to the court for permission if the deadline has passed. The court will consider your reasons and any prejudice to the other party.

What happens if you miss a court deadline in Kenya?+

You can ask the court for an extension of time. You must explain why you missed the deadline and show that granting extra time will not unfairly disadvantage the other side. The court has discretion to allow or refuse your request.

Can the Supreme Court of Kenya extend time for filing an appeal?+

Yes, the Supreme Court has the power to extend time under Section 21(3) of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 53 of the Supreme Court Rules. It will only do so if the applicant provides reasonable and cogent reasons for the delay.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Attorney General v Zinj Limited", Case Analysis (2020). Petition 1 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2020/42/eng@2020-08-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.